The Contribution of the Bladder Outlet to the Relation Between Pressure and Flow Rate During Micturition

  • Werner Schäfer

Abstract

Since the measurement of bladder pressure and urine flow rate during micturition have become possible, numerous attempts have been made to describe, explain, and define the relationship between the two. Obviously a term such as “urethral resistance” should be suitable to define the relationship between the typical hydrodynamic parameters (pressure and flow rate); and analogies to more or less sophisticated fluid dynamics suggest themselves. The concepts of various “urethral resistance factors” have treated micturition as a simple hydrodynamic process and attempted to reduce the complex dynamics to a single number. However, the potential value of such a factor is poor and, based on physically inadequate assumptions, can be physiologically misleading. A more realistic concept, the “urethral resistance relation” (URR), shows the pressure/flow relationship during the whole process of voiding, but adequate interpretation is difficult.

Keywords

Catheter Resis Alan Cough Exter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams PH, Griffiths DJ: The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol 51: 129–134, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates CP, Arnold EP, Griffiths DJ: The nature of the abnormality in bladder neck obstruction. Br J Urol 47: 651–656, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates CP, Bradley WE, Glen ES, Griffiths DJ, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling AM, Hald T: Third report on the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 12: 191–193, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bottaccini MR, Gleason DM, Byrne JC: Resistance measurements in the human urethra. In Lutzeyer W, Melchior H (eds.): Urodynamics: Upper and lower urinary tract. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gleason DM, Bottaccini MR, Drach GW: Urodynamics. J Urol 115: 356–361, 1976Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gleason DM, Bottaccini MR, Reilly RJ: The shape and cross-sectional area of the distal urethra critically affects urinary flow. Invest Urol 8: 585–595, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffiths DJ: Hydrodynamics of male micturition. I. Theory of steady flow through elastic-walled tubes. Med Biol Eng 9: 581–588, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Griffiths DJ: Hydrodynamics of male micturition. II. Measurements of stream parameters and urethral elasticity. Med Biol Eng 9: 589–596, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffiths DJ: The mechanics of the urethra and of micturition. Br J Urol 45: 497–507, 1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinman F Jr (ed.): Hydrodynamics of Micturition. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1971Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyhoff HH, Griffiths DJ, Nordling J, Hald T: Clinical application of momentum flux measurements with special reference to detrusor hyperreflexia and meatal stenosis. Urol Res 8: 71–75, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyhoff HH, Griffiths DJ, Nordling J, Haid T: Momentum flux values at maximum flow rates in normal males. Urol Res 8: 67–70, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehfisch E: Ueber den Mechanismus des Harnbla-senverschlusses und der Harnentleerung. Virchow Archiv für path. Anatomie und Physiologie Bd 115: 111–151, 1897Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rollema HJ, Griffiths DJ, van Duyl WA, van den Berg J, de Haan R: Flow rate versus bladder volume. Urol Int 32: 401–412, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schäfer W: A computing unit for the analysis of micturition. Digest 11th ICMBE, Ottawa, 1976Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schäfer W: Eine physiologische Methode zur Be-schreibung der Druck-Flow-Beziehung während der Miktion. Biomed Technik 21: 11–12, 1976Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schäfer W: Computer application for urodynamic studies. In Zinner NR, Sterling AM (eds.): Female Incontinence. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1981Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schäfer W: The detrusor as the energy source of micturition. In Hinman F Jr (ed.): Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983, pp 450–469Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schäfer W, Fischer B, Meyhoff HH, Lutzeyer W: Urethral resistance during voiding: I. The passive urethral resistance relation, PURR. II. The dynamic urethral resistance relation, DURR. Proceedings of the XIth Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society, London, 1981Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schäfer W, Gerlach R, Hannappel J: Microtip versus standard transducers: What do they really measure? Proceedings of the XIIth Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society, Leiden, 1982Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schäfer W, Sterling AM, Melchior H: Bladder neck and urethra in a physical model. Urol Int 31: 21–22, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sjöberg B, Nyman CR: Hydrodynamics of micturition in healthy females: pressure and flow at different micturition volumes. Urol Int 36: 23–34, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith JC: Urethral resistance to micturition. Br J Urol 68: 125–156, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sterling AM, Griffiths DJ: Measurements of the elasticity of the male urethral meatus by urinary drop spectrometry. Urol Int 31: 321–331, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stibitz GR: Bistable mathematical and mechanical models related to the urethra. Bull Math Biophys 29: 57–65, 1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sundblad R: Urinary bladder dynamics in women. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 6, 1971Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tanagho EA, Miller ER: Initiation of voiding. Br J Urol 42: 175–183, 1970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Von Garrelts B: Analysis of micturition: a new method of recording the voiding of the bladder. Acta Chir Scand 112: 326–340, 1956Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Von Garrelts B: Intravesical pressure and urinary 496 flow rate during micturition in normal subjects. Acta Chir Scand 114: 49–66, 1957Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Von Garrelts B: Micturition in disorders of the prostate and posterior urethra. Acta Chir Scand 115: 227–241, 1958Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Von Garrelts B: Micturition in the normal male. Acta Chir Scand 114: 197–210, 1957Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Von Garrelts B: Micturition in urethral strictures. Acta Chir Scand 114: 466–489, 1957Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yalla SV, Blute R, Waters WB, Snyders H, Fraser L: Urodynamic evaluation of prostatic enlargements with micturitional vesicourethral static pressure profile. J Urol 125: 685–689, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yalla SV, Sharma GVRK, Barsamian EM: Micturitional static urethral pressure profile: a method of recording urethral pressure profile during voiding and the implications. J Urol 124: 649–656, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yalla SV, Waters WB, Snyders H, Varady S, Blute R: Urodynamic localization of isolated bladder neck obstruction in men: studies with micturitional vesicourethral static pressure profile. J Urol 125: 677–684, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zinner NR, Ritter RC, Sterling AM, Donker PJ: The physical basis of some urodynamic measurements. J Urol 117: 682–689, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Werner Schäfer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations