The phenomenon of incontinence after prostatectomy is still a subject of controversy. Many approaches to treatment exist, yet none is entirely satisfactory. The assumption that postprostatectomy incontinence is mainly due to injury to the external sphincter is not supported by experimental or clinical data. Actually, it is the loss of sphincteric closure pressure of the smooth component that is responsible for the incontinence, as urodynamic studies clearly show. To confront the problem rationally—even better, to prevent it—we must understand thoroughly the basic anatomy, physiology, and urodynamic characteristics of the lower urinary tract and the deviations from the normal that often occur after prostatectomy.
KeywordsFatigue Catheter Peri Epinephrine Tate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bazeed MA, Thüroff JW, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA: Histochemical study of urethral striated musculature in the dog. J Urol 12: 406–410, 1982Google Scholar
- 9.Tanagho EA: Anatomy and physiology of the urethra. In Caldwell KPS (ed.): Urinary Incontinence. Sector Publishing, London, 1975Google Scholar
- 10.Tanagho EA: Embryology of the genitourinary system. In Smith DR (ed.): General Urology, 9th ed. Lange Medical Publications, Los Altos, CA, 1978, pp 14–25Google Scholar
- 12.Tanagho EA: Postprostatectomy incontinence. I. Physiology and pathophysiology of micturition. In Weber D, Jonas D (eds.): Postoperative Urinary Incontinence. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 1981, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- 13.Tanagho EA: Urodynamic factors in total urinary incontinence. In preparationGoogle Scholar