Skip to main content

Laboratory Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Fundamentals of Family Medicine

Abstract

The decision to set up and maintain an office laboratory is complex. The interest and expertise of the individual physician, availability of suitable laboratory services, appropriate paramedical help, economic considerations, and the specific needs of the patient population are among parameters that influence the decision. Unless the physician has the time and interest to become actively and regularly involved, the office laboratory should not be considered. (Additional discussion of theoretical and practical considerations regarding the office laboratory is found in Chap. 94.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henry JB (ed): Clinical Diagnosis by Laboratory Methods. 16th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tietz NW (ed): Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henry RJ, Cannon DC, Winkelman JW (eds): Clinical Chemistry: Principles and Technics. Hagerstown, Md, Harper & Row, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown SS, Mitchell FL, Young DS: Chemical Diagnosis of Disease. New York, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Free AH, Free HM: Urinalysis in Clinical Laboratory Practice. Cleveland, CRC Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cowen, JB: Results of a Survey of Physician’s Offices in Northwest Illinois. IMJ 149: 377, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Survey of Physicians’ Office Laboratories: Bureau of Quality Assurance, United States Public Health Service, Rockville, Md, 1975: (HSM) 110–72–341.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shephard MDS, Penberthy LA, Fräser CG: Short-and long-term biological variation in analyses of urine of apparently healthy individuals. Clin Chem 27:569–573, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James GP, Bee DE, Fuller JB: Accuracy and precision of urine pH determinations using two commercially available dipsticks. Am J Clin Pathol 70: 368–374, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller SE: Examination of urine. In: Miller SE (ed.) A Textbook of Clinical Pathology. 7th ed. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grant GH, Kachmar JF: The proteins of body fluids. In: Tietz NW (ed.) Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1976, pp. 298–377.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Date JW: Quantitative determination of some carbohydrates in normal urine. ScandJ Clin Lab Invest, 10: 155, 1958.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. James GP, Bee KE: Glucosuria: accuracy and precision of laboratory diagnosis by dipstick analysis. Clin Chem 25: 996–1001, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright WT: Cell counts in urine. Arch Intern Med 103: 76, 1959.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook MH, Free HM, Free AH: The detection of blood in urine. Am J Med Technol 22: 218, 1956.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Relman AS, Levinsky, NG: Clinical examination of renal function. In: Strauss MB, Welt LG (eds) Diseases of the Kidney. Boston, Little, Brown, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strauss MB, Welt LG (eds): Diseases of the Kidney. Vols 1 and 2, Boston, Little, Brown, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levinsky NG: The interpretation of proteinuria and the urinary sediment. In: Disease-a-Month. Chicago, Yearbook Medical, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lippman RW: Urine and the Urinary Sediment. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman JA, Beeler MF: Laboratory Medicine—Clinical Microscopy. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1974, pp. 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kubilis P, Rosenbloom AL: Accurate home glucose monitoring without a meter. Diabetes Care 3: 640–641, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferguson SD, Prosser R: Are reflectance meters necessary for home blood glucose monitoring? Br Med J 281: 912, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward Laboratory Syllabus, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Halsted JA, Halsted CH (eds.) The Laboratory in Clinical Medicine—Interpretation and Application. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kunin CM: Detection, Prevention, and Management of Urinary Tract Infections. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stamey TA: Pathogenesis and Treatment of Urinary tract Infections. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ash, K.O., Matsen, J.M., Rothstein, G. (1983). Laboratory Diagnosis. In: Taylor, R.B., Rosen, M.G., Jacott, W.E., Donatelle, E.P., Buckingham, J.L. (eds) Fundamentals of Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5433-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5433-1_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90705-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5433-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics