• David Wick


Scientists sometimes pretend that what they do is as natural as breathing, and hence they have no philosophies. But Heisenberg, Bohr, Schrodinger, and Einstein all paid attention to theirs, and indeed no scientific discipline in this century has attracted more philosophical comment than quantum physics.172 Should one not therefore make a compendium of these views, the better to shift truth from error?


Quantum Mechanic Large Hadron Collider Naive Realism Vital Force Complementarity Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Professional philosophers prefer, in place of my naive realism, either “critical” or “representational” realism; see the article “Realism” in: The Encylopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards, ed.Google Scholar
  2. Corpuscles: see Whittaker (1951), p. 31–32.Google Scholar
  3. Lily E. Kay in J. Hist. Bio. 18:2, (1985), p. 207–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delbrück’s article “A physicist’s renewed look at biology: twenty years later,” Science 168 (1970), pp. 1312–1315.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohr’s references to psychology: Nature 121, 1928, p. 580–590ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Die Naturwissenshaften 17, 1929, p. 483–486; the first reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Wick
    • 1
  1. 1.SeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations