The Inupiat and Development: How Do They Mix?
One hundred and fifty years ago, the North Slope Inupiat organized their way of life around caribou, seal, bowhead whale, and other prey. After successive developments brought commercial whalers, missionaries, traders, military personnel, government administrators, and, most recently, the oil industry to the North Slope, the traditional Inupiat way of life has changed dramatically, but it has not disappeared. It is also clear that the development activities themselves account for only part of the story. The Inupiat have made a substantial impact on their own society, and it is the interaction between external and internal forces that make the North Slope a fascinating lesson in regional, social, and economic change.
KeywordsNorth Slope Traumatic Death Subsistence Activity Bowhead Whale Outer Continental Shelf
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Joseph Sonnenfeld, “Changes in Subsistence among the Barrow Eskimo.” Ph.D. dissertation at Johns Hopkins University, 1957, p. 235.Google Scholar
- James Van Stone, Point Hope: An Eskimo Village in Transition (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1962), p. 42.Google Scholar
- Charles Brower, P.J. Farrelly, and Lyman Anson, Fifty Years Below Zero (New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co., 1942), p. 162.Google Scholar
- Gerald A. McBeath, North Slope Borough Government and Policymaking (Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research, 1981), p. 12.Google Scholar
- John A. Kruse, Subsistence and the North Slope Inupiat: The Effects of Energy Development (Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research, 1982), p. 18.Google Scholar
- Thomas A. Morehouse, Robert Childers, and Linda E. Leask, Fish and Wildlife Protection in the Planning and Construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline (Anchorage: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior, 1978).Google Scholar
- J. Kruse et al., Socioeconomics of the North Slope Borough, Technical Report Number 85 (Anchorage: Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1982), pp. 112–118.Google Scholar