Utilization of Host Proteins as Virus Receptors
A general construct in microbiology is that parasites and their hosts continuously evolve to ensure the survival of each. A significant portion of virologic research has been devoted to describing strategies used by different viruses to survive despite attempts by the host to prevent their replication. One hypothesis holds that virus attachment to host cell molecules unique to susceptible cells governs virus spread to, and infection of, specific target organs . Our focus is on the implication of recent research developments that support this hypothesis. The observations have been made with viruses from diverse genera and with cells of different functional types. It may be overly simplistic to state that tissue tropisms are readily defined on the basis of attachment per se, but attachment is a logical starting point in studying the evolution of virus—host interactions, since it has been shown that both virus and host-cell receptors are genetically controlled [1,2]. An excellent review of general principles related to animal virus attachment has been written recently by Holmes . A key issue in relating host-cell molecules to virus attachment is identification of the “productive receptor” . This is the receptor that leads to infection rather than one that binds virus nonspecifically. Many enveloped viruses bind well to a number of nonproductive substrates including inanimate surfaces, such as polystyrene plates, which are not obviously related to tissue tropisms in vivo.
KeywordsLymphoma Sarcoma Polypeptide Neurol Polystyrene
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Crowell RL (1976) Comparative generic characteristics of picornavirus-receptor interactions. In Beers RF Jr, Bassett EG (eds) Cell Membrane Receptors for Viruses, Antigens and Antibodies, Polypeptide Hormones, and Small Molecules. Raven Press, New York, p 202Google Scholar
- 3.Holmes KV (1981) The biology and biochemistry of cellular receptors for enveloped viruses. In Lonberg-Holm K, Philipson L (eds) Virus Receptors. Part 2. Chapman and Hall, London, p 85Google Scholar
- 7.Weiss RA (1976) Receptors for RNA tumor viruses. In Beers RF Jr, Bassett EG (eds) Cell Membrane Receptors for Viruses, Antigens and Antibodies, Polypeptide Hormones, and Small Molecules. Raven Press, New York, p 237Google Scholar
- 11.Tignor GH, Shope RE, Bishop DHL, Smith AL, Burrage TG (1983) California serogroup gene structure-function relationships: Virulence and tissue tropisms. In Calisher CH (ed) California Serogroup Viruses. Alan R. Liss, New York, in pressGoogle Scholar
- 12.Smith AL (1978) In vitro characterization of host cell receptors in a Sindbis virus model of neuro virulence. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
- 17.Magrath I, Freeman C, Santaella M, Gadek J, Frank M, Spiegel R, Novikovs L (1981) Induction of complement receptor expression in cell lines derived from human undifferentiated lymphomas. II. Characterization of the induced complement receptors and demonstration of the simultaneous induction of EBV receptor. J Immunol 127:1039–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar