Skip to main content

Action Research: Its Value in Gerontology and Geriatrics

  • Chapter
Geriatric Medicine

Abstract

Action research offers certain advantages to investigators in geriatrics and gerontology over conventional models of research. It is, by definition, “applied research.” This application involves three domains. First, the intervention addresses questions that cannot be answered by purely descriptive or analytic studies. Second, the collaboration enables those persons who are directly affected by the system under study to provide useful perspectives and to suggest important research questions. Such collaboration also can improve the dissemination of research. Third, the service aspect can be an integral part of the research design, thereby increasing the significance of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kuhn TS: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, ed 2. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chein I, Cooh SW, Harding J: The field of action research. Am Psychol3: 43 – 50, 1948.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kent DP, Kastenbaum R, Sherwood S (eds): Research, Planning, and Action for the Elderly. New York, Behavioral Publications, 1972, pp 71 – 95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kastenbaum R: Wine and fellowship in aging: An exploratory action study. J Hum Rel13: 266 – 276, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oquist P: The epistemology of action research. Acta Sociologica21: 143 – 163, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Susman GI, Evered RD: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Adm Sci Q23: 582 – 603, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelman HR: The underdevelopment of evaluative research on health services for the elderly in the United States. Int J Health Serv10: 501 – 511, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mushkin SJ, Dunlop DW (eds): Health: What is it Worth? Measures of Health Benefits. New York, Pergamon Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lichtenstein H, Winograd CH: Geriatric consultation: A functional approach. J Am Geriatr Soc32: 49 – 55, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jahnigen D, Hannon C, Laxson L, et al: Iatrogenic disease in hospitalized elderly veterans. J. Am Geriatr Soc30: 382 – 39, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steel K: Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med34: 638 – 642, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubenstein LZ, Rhee L, Kane RL: The role of geriatric assessment units in caring for the elderly: An analytic review. J Gerontol5: 513 – 521, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Campion EW, Jette A, Berkman B: An interdisciplinary geriatric consultation service: A controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc31: 792 – 796, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hicks B, Raisz H, Segal J, et al: The triage experiment in coordinated care for the elderly. Am J Pub Health71: 991 – 1003, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Callahan JJ: How much, for what, and for whom? Am J Pub Health71: 987 – 988, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jonas H: Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects, in Freund P (ed): Experimentation with Human Subjects. New York, Braziller, 1970, pp 1 – 31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jameton AL: Informed consent and voluntariness in the social context of senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type, in Melnik V, Dubler N (eds): SDAT and Related Diseases: Ethical and Legal Issues Related to Informed Consent. Clifton, N.J. Humana Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Langer EJ, Rodin J, Beck P, et al: Environmental determinants of memory improvement in late adulthood. J Pers Soc Psych37: 2203 – 2213, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evashwick C, Oatis S, Herriott M: Health and Social Needs of the Elderly: A Comparison of Residents of Public Housing and Residents of the Neighboring Communities. University of Washington Institute on Institute on Aging, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winograd, C.H. (1984). Action Research: Its Value in Gerontology and Geriatrics. In: Cassel, C.K., Walsh, J.R. (eds) Geriatric Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5232-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5232-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9749-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5232-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics