Instruments to Assess Functional Status

  • Rosalie A. Kane


The essence of geriatric practice is the expert management of a patient’s needs. To accomplish this goal, a geriatric team must translate its knowledge about a patient’s functional abilities and limitations, psychological state, social supports, and personal preferences into recommendations that often have far-reaching effects on a patient’s life style. This requires a physician to become involved in collecting, synthesizing, interpreting, and weighing a formidable amount of patient-specific information. Much of this information differs, in kind, from laboratory values, physical signs and symptoms, and radiology results, which are combined to reach a medical diagnosis.


Nursing Home Sickness Impact Profile Geriatric Team Sessment Tool Physical Functioning General 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kane RA, Kane RL: Assessing the Elderly: A Practical Guide to Measurement, Lexington, Mass, DC Heath & Co, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosencranz HA, Philblad CT: Measuring the health of the elderly. J Gerontol25: 129 – 133, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lawton MP: The Philadelphia Geriatric Morale Scale: A revision. J Gerontol30: 85 – 89, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Havighurst R, Neugarten G, Tobin S: The measure of life satisfaction. J Gerontol16: 134 – 143, 1961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloom M, Blenkner M: Assessing functioning of older persons living in the community. Gerontologist10: 331 – 337, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: Working Document on Patient Care Management. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1978a.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set. Preliminary report of the Technical Consultant Panel on the Long-Term Care Data Set, United States National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1978b.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfeiffer E: A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc23: 433 – 441, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahn RL, Goldfarb AI, Pollack M, et al: Brief objective measures for the determination of mental status in the aged. Am J of Psychiatry117: 326 – 328, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al: The sickness impact profile: Conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv6: 393 – 415, 1976a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, et al: Sickness impact profile: Validation of a health status measure. Med Care14: 57 – 67, 1976b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, et al: The Sickness impact profile: Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Pub Health65: 1304 – 1310, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development: Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuriansky JB, Gurland B: Performance test of activities of daily living. Int J Aging Human Dev7: 343 – 352, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al: Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psycho-social function. JAMA185:94ff, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sherwood SJ, Morris J, Mor V, et al: Compendium of measures for describing and assessing long term care populations. Boston, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, 1977 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jette AM, Deniston OL: Inter-observer reliability of a functional status assessment instrument. J Chron Dis31: 573 – 580, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schoening HA, Iversen IA: Numerical sorting of self-care status: A study of the Kenny Self-Care Evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehab49: 221 – 229, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gurland BJ, Dean LL, Copeland J, et al: Criteria for the diagnosis of dementia in the community elderly. Gerontologist22: 180 – 186, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gurland BJ: The assessment of the mental health status of older adults, in Birren JE, Sloane RB (eds): Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalie A. Kane

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations