Advertisement

Behavioral responses of birds to pesticides and other contaminants

  • D. B. Peakall
Part of the Residue Reviews book series (RECT, volume 96)

Abstract

At a symposium, which has been considered as a landmark in environmental concerns, held at the Institute for Terrestrial Ecology in 1965 the following statements on behavioral toxicology were made (Warner et al. 1966):
  1. (1)

    “The behavior (or activities) of an organism represents the final integrated result of a diversity of biochemical and physiological processes. Thus, a single behavioral parameter is generally more comprehensive than a physiological or biochemical parameter.

     
  2. (2)

    Behavioral patterns are known to be highly sensitive to changes in the steady state of an organism. This sensitivity is one of the key values for its use in exploring sublethal toxicity.

     
  3. (3)

    Behavioral measurements can usually be made without direct physical harm to the organism. With aquatic animals especially, implantation of detectors introduces problems of considerable complexity. Behavioral measurements can avoid this difficulty.”

     

Keywords

Operant Behavior Courtship Behavior Herring Gull Mallard Duck Visual Cliff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albers, P. H., and G. H. Heinz, FLIT MLO and No. 2 Fuel Oil, Effects of aerosol applications to Mallard eggs on hatchability and behavior of ducklings. Environ. Res. 30, 381–388 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, R. D., L. J. Leach, P. R. Belluscio, E. A. Maynard, H. C. Hodge, and J. K. Scott, Behavioral changes in the pigeon following inhalation of mercury vapor. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 24, 366 - 375 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Barthalmus, G. T., J. D. Leander, D. E. McMillan, P. Mushak, and M. R. Krigman, Chronic effects of lead on schedule-controlled pigeon behavior. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 42, 271–284 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter, W. L., R. F Linder, and R. B. Dahlgren, Dieldrin effects in two generations of penned hen pheasants. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 33, 96–102 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beliles, R. P., R. S. Clark, P R. Belluscio, C. L. Yuile, and L. R. Leach, Behavioral effects in pigeons exposed to mercury vapor at a concentration of 0.1 mg/m3. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 28, 482–484 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. Bird, D. M., D. B. Peakall, and D. S. Miller, Enzymatic changes in the oviduct associated with DDE-induced eggshell thinning in the Kestrel, Falco sparverius. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 31, 22–24 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunyan, P J., D. M. Jennings, and A. Taylor, Organophosphorus poisoning, Some properties of avian esterases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16, 326–331 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, R. G., and P. Lukasiewicz, A field study of the effect of crude oil on Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) chick growth. Auk 96, 809–812 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. Cavallin, C., B. Persson, and S. Ulfstrand, Total activity of caged small birds, A new recording method. Oikos 23, 140–141 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cool, K. L., R. L. Linder, and D. R. Progulske, Adoptive behaviour of caged pheasants exposed to chicks and dieldrin. Amer. Midl. Natur. 88, 262–269 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Custer, T. W., and P H. Albers, Response of captive, breeding mallards to oiled water. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 44, 915–918 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Custer, T. W., and G. H. Heinz, Reproductive success and nest attentiveness of Mallard ducks fed Aroclor 1254. Environ. Follut. (Ser. A). 21, 313–318 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlgren, R. B., and R. L. Linder, Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on pheasant reproduction, behavior and survival. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 35, 315–319 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahlgren, R. B., and R. L. Linder, Effects of dieldrin in penned pheasants through the third generation. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 38, 320–330 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahlgren, R. B., R. L. Linder, and K. K. Ortman, Dieldrin effects on susceptibility of penned pheasants to hand capture. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 34, 957–959 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeRosa, C. T., D. H. Taylor, M. P Farrell, and S. K. Seilkop, Effects of sevin on the reproductive biology of the Coturnix. Poul. Sci. 55, 2133–2141 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. Enderson, J. H., and D. D. Berger, Pesticides, Eggshell thinning and lowered production of young in Prairie Falcons. BioScience 20, 355–356 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enderson, J. H., S. A. Temple, and L. G. Swartz, Time-lapse photographic records of nesting Peregrine Falcons. Living Bird 11, 113–128 (1972).Google Scholar
  19. Farris, H. E., Behavioral development, social organization and conditioning of courting behavior in the Japanese. quail, Coturnix coturix japonica. Ph.D. Dissertation. Michigan State Univ., Lansing, Michigan, 182 pp. (1964).Google Scholar
  20. Ferster, C. B., and B. F. Skinner, Schedules of reinforcement. New York, AppletonCentury-Crofts. (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, G. A., and T. Donald, Organochlorine pollutants, nest defense behavior and reproductive success in Merlins. Condor 82, 81–84 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox, G. A., A. P. Gilman, D. B. Peakall, and F. W. Anderka, Behavioral abnormalities of nesting Lake Ontario herring gulls. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 42, 477–483 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frederick, R. B., Effects of lead nitrate ingestion on open field-behavior of mallard ducks. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 16, 739–742 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fyfe, R. W., R. W. Risborough, and W. Walker, II, Pollutant effects on the reproduction of Prairie Falcons and Merlins of the Canadian Prairies. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90, 346–355 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. Gesell, C. G., R. J. Robel, A. D. Dayton, and J. Frieman, Effects of dieldrin on operant behavior in bobwhites. J. Environ. Sci. Health (Sec. B.) 14, 153–170 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilman, A. P, G. A. Fox, D. B. Peakall, S. M. Teeple, T. R. Carroll, and G. T. Haymes, Reproductive parameters and egg contaminant levels of Great Lakes herring gulls. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 41, 458–468 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grue, C. E., G. V. N. Powell, and M. J. McChesney, Care of nestlings by wild female starlings exposed to an organophosphate pesticide. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 327–335 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grue, C. E., and B. K. Shipley, Interpreting population estimates of birds following pesticide applications-behavior of male starlings exposed to an organophosphate pesticide. Studies Avian Biol. 6, 292–296 (1981).Google Scholar
  29. Haegele, M. A., and R. H. Hudson, DDE effects on reproduction of Ring Doves. Environ. Pollut. 4, 53–57 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haegele, M. A., and R. H. Hudson, Reduction of courtship behavior induced by DDE in male Ringed Turtle Doves. Wilson Bull. 89, 593–601 (1977).Google Scholar
  31. Heath, R. G., J. W. Spann, E. F. Hill, and J. F. Kreitzer, Comparative dietary toxicities of pesticides to birds. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. 152, 57 pp. (1972).Google Scholar
  32. Heinz, G., Effects of methylmercury on approach and avoidance behavior of mallard ducklings. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 13, 554–564 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heinz, G., Methylmercury, Second year feeding effects on mallard reproduction and duckling behavior. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 40, 82–90 (1976a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heinz, G. H., Methylmercury, Second-generation reproductive and behavioral effects on Mallard ducks. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 40, 710–715 (1976b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heinz, G. H., Behavior of Mallard ducklings from parents fed 3 ppm of DDE. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 16, 640–645 (1976c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heinz, G. H., Methylmercury, Reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of Mallard ducks. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 43, 394–401 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heinz, G. H., and M. T. Finley, Toxaphene does not affect avoidance behavior of young Black Ducks. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 42, 408–409 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heinz, G. H., and S. D. Haseltine, Avoidance behavior of young Black ducks treated with chromium. Toxicol. Letters 8, 307–310 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heinz, G. H., S. D. Haseltine, and L. Sileo, Altered avoidance behavior of young black ducks fed cadmium. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2, 419–421 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hill, E. F., and D. J. Hoffman, Avian models for toxicity testing. J. Amer. College Toxicology 3, 357–376 (1984).Google Scholar
  41. Hudson, R. H., R. K. Tucker, and M. A. Haegele, Handbook of toxicity of pesticides to wildlife. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Serv. Resource Publ. 153, 90 pp. (1984).Google Scholar
  42. Hughes, J. A., E. Rosenthal, and S. B. Sparber, Time dependent effects produced in chicks after prenatal injection of methylmercury. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 4, 507–513 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. James, D., and K. B. Davis, Jr., The effect of sub-lethal amounts of DDT on the discriminations ability of the bobwhite, Colinus virginianus (Linnaeus). Am. Zool. 5, 229 (1965).Google Scholar
  44. Jefferies, D. J., The delay in ovulation produced by pp’-DDT and its possible significance in the field. Ibis 109, 266–272 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karlsson, B., B. Persson, A. Sodergen, and S. Ulfstrand, Locomotory and dehydrogenase activities of Redstarts Phoenicurus phoenicurus L. (Aves) given PCB and DDT. Environ. Pollut. 7, 53–63 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Keith, J. O., Synergistic effects of DDE and food stress on reproduction in Brown Pelicans and Ring Doves. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State Univ., 199 pp. (1978).Google Scholar
  47. King, K. A., D. A. White, and C. A. Mitchell, Nest defense behavior and reproductive success of Laughing Gulls sublethally dosed with parathion. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 33, 499–504 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kreitzer, J. F., Effects of toxaphene and endrin at very low dietary concentrations on discrimination acquisition and reversal in bobwhite quail, Colinus virginianus. Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 23, 217–230 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kreitzer, J. F., and G. H. Heinz, The effect of sublethal dosages of five pesticides and a polychlorinated biphenyl on the avoidance response of Coturnix Quail chicks. Environ. Pollut. 6, 21–29 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laties, V. G., and H. L. Evans, Methylmercury-induced changes in operant discrimination by the pigeon. J. Pharmacol. Expt. Therap. 214, 620–628 (1980).Google Scholar
  51. Leander, J. D., D. E. McMillan, and T. S. Barlow, Chronic mercuric chloride, Behavioral effects in Pigeons. J. Pharmacol. Expt. Therap. 201, 424–435 (1977).Google Scholar
  52. Lewis, M. F., H. W. Mertens, and J. A. Steer, Behavioral changes from chronic exposure to pesticides used in aerial application, Effects on phosdrin on the performance of monkey and pigeons on variable interval reinforcement schedules. Aerospace Med. 44, 290–293 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lincer, J. L., DDE-induced eggshell thinning in the American Kestrel, A comparison of the field situation and laboratory results. J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 781–793 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lincer, J. L., and D. B. Peakall, Metabolic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls in the American Kestrel. Nature 228, 783–784 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ludwig, J. P., and C. S. Tomoff, Reproductive success and insecticide residues in Lake Michigan Herring Gulls. Jack Pine Warbler 44, 77–84 (1966).Google Scholar
  56. McArthur, M. L. B., G. A. Fox, D. B. Peakall, and B. J. R. Philogene, Ecological significance of behavioral and hormonal abnormalities in breeding ring doves fed an organochlorine mixture. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 12, 343–353 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McEwen, L. C., and R. L. Brown, Acute toxicity of dieldrin and malathion to wild sharptailed grouse. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 30, 604–611 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mahoney, J. J. Jr., Residue accumulation in white-throated sparrows fed DDT for 5 and 11 weeks. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 12, 677–681 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mahoney, J. J. Jr., DDT and DDE effects on migratory condition in White-throated Sparrows. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 39, 520–527 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller, W. T., and L. S. Miller, Synopsis of behavior traits in the ring dove. Anim. Behav. 6, 3–8 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Milstein, P. L. S., I. Prestt, and A. A. Bell, The breeding cycle of the Grey Heron. Ardea 58, 171–257 (1970).Google Scholar
  62. Mineau, P., and D. B. Peakall, An evaluation of avian impact assessment techniques following broadscale forest insecticide sprays. (In press).Google Scholar
  63. Nelson, R. W., Behavioral aspects of egg breakage in Peregrine Falcon. Canadian Field Naturalist 90, 320–329 (1976).Google Scholar
  64. Osborn, D., and M. P. Harris, A procedure for implanting a slow release formation of an environmental pollutant into a free-living animal. Environ. Pollut. 19, 139–144 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peakall, D. B., and M. L. Peakall, Effect of a polychlorinated biphenyl on the reproduction of artificially and naturally incubated dove eggs. J. Appl. Ecol. 10, 863–868 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peakall, D. B., p,p’-DDT, Effect on calcium metabolism and concentration of estradiol in the blood. Science 168, 592–594 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peakall, D. B., G. A. Fox, A. P. Gilman, D. J. Hallett, and R. J. Norstrom, Reproductive success of Herring Gulls as an indicator of Great Lakes water quality. In B. K. Afghan and D. MacKay (eds.): Hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons in the aquatic environment. Environmental Science Research 16, 337 (1980).Google Scholar
  68. Ratcliffe, D. A., Changes attributable to pesticides in egg breakage frequency and eggshell thickness in some British birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 7, 67–115 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Revzin, A. M., Effects of endrin on telencephalic functions in the pigeon. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 9, 75–83 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richie, P. J., and T. J. Peterle, Effect of DDE on circulating luteinizing hormone levels in ring doves during courtship and nesting. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 23, 220–226 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenthal, E., and S. B. Sparber, Methylmercury dicyandiamide, Retardation of detour learning in chicks hatched from injected eggs. Life Sci. 11, 883–893 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Robel, R. J., R. W. Felthousen, and A. D. Dayton, Effects of dietary carbofuran on Bobwhite activity patterns. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 30, 105–109 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robel, R. J., R. W. Felthousen, and A. D. Dayton, Effects of carbamates on bobwhite food intake, body weight, and locomotor activity. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 11, 611–615 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rudolph, S. G., D. W. Anderson, and R. W. Risebrough, Kestrel predatory behaviour under chronic low-level exposure to DDE. Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A.) 32, 121–136 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rudolph, S. G., J. G. Zinkl, D. W. Anderson, and P J. Shea, Prey-capturing ability of American Kestrels fed DDE or acephate or acephate alone. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 13, 367–372 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sanderson, C. A., and L. J. Rogers, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid causes behavioral effects in chickens at environmentally relevant doses. Science 211, 593–595 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma, R. P., Brain biogenic amines, Depletion by chronic dieldrin exposure. Life Sci. 13, 1245–1251 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sharma, R. P., D. S. Winn, and J. L. Shupe, Neurologic and behavioral effects of dietary dieldrin in juvenile Mallard ducks. Toxic. Applied Pharmacol. 19, 405–406 (1971).Google Scholar
  79. Sharma, R. P., D. S. Winn, and J. B. Low, Toxic, neurochemical and behavioral effects of dieldrin exposure in mallard ducks. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 5, 43–53 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stanford, J. A., An evaluation of the adoption method of bobwhite quail propagation. N. Amer. Wildl. Conf. Trans. 17, 330–337 (1952).Google Scholar
  81. Synder, N. F. R., H. A. Synder, J. L. Lincer, and L. T. Reynolds, Organochlorines, heavy metals, and the biology of North America accipiters. BioScience 23, 300–305 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stickel, W. H., W. L. Reichel, and D. L. Hughes, Endrin in Birds, Lethal Residues and Secondary Poisoning. In W. B. Deichmann (ed.): Toxicol. and Occup. Med., pp. 397–406. New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  83. Stickel, W. H., L. F Stickel, R. A. Dyrland, and D. L. Hughes, DDE in Birds, Lethal Residues and Loss Rates. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 13, 1–6 (1984a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stickel, W. H., L. F Stickel, R. A. Dyrland, and D. L. Hughes, Aroclor 1254 Residues in Birds, Lethal Levels and Loss Rates. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 13, 7–13 (1984b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stickel, W. H., L. F Stickel, and J. W. Spann, Tissue residues of dieldrin in relation to mortality in birds and mammals. In M. W. Miller and G. G. Berg (eds.), Chemical Fallout, Current Research on Persistent Pesticides. Proc. First Rochester Conf. on Toxicity, pp. 174–204 (1969).Google Scholar
  86. Szaro, R. C., M. P Dieter, G. N. Heinz, and J. F Ferrell, Effects of chronic ingestion of South Louisiana crude oil on mallard ducklings. Environ. Res. 17, 426–436 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tallarico, R. B., and W. M. Farrell, Studies of visual depth perception, An effect of early experience on chicks on the visual cliff. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57, 94–96 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tori, G. M., and T. J. Peterle, Effects of PCBs on Mourning Dove courtship behavior. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 30, 44–49 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tucker, R. K., and J. S. Leitzke, Comparative toxicology of insecticides for vertebrate wildlife and fish. Pharmacol. Ther. 6, 167–220 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ulfstrand, S., A. Sodergren, and J. Rabol, Effect of PCB on nocturnal activity in caged robins, Erithacus rubeculal. Nature 231, 467–468 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Warner, R. E., K. K. Peterson, and L. Borgman, Behavioural pathology in fish, A quantitative study of sublethal pesticide toxication. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 223–247 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wiemeyer, S. N., P R. Spitzer, W. C. Krantz, T. G. Lamont, and E. Cromartie, Effects of environmental pollutants on Connecticut and Maryland Ospreys. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 39, 124–139 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, D. H., C. A. Mitchell, and E. F Hill, Parathion alters incubation behavior of Laughing Gulls. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 31, 93–97 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woolf, H. B. (ed.), Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary. G. and C. Merrian, Springfield, Mass., (1977).Google Scholar
  95. Zinkl, J. G., C. J. Henny, and L. R. DeWeese, Brain cholinesterase activities of birds from forests sprayed with trichlorfon (Dylox) and carbaryl (Seven-4-oil). Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 17, 379–386 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zinkl, J. G., C. J. Henny, and P J. Shea, Brain cholinesterase activities of passerine birds in forests sprayed with cholinesterase inhibiting insecticides. In Animals as Monitors of Environmental Pollutants, National Academy Science, Washington, D.C., pp. 356–365 (1979).Google Scholar
  97. Zinkl, J. G., R. B. Robert, P J. Shea, and J. Lasmanis, Toxicity of acephate and methamidophos to dark-eyed juncos. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 10, 185–192 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Peakall
    • 1
  1. 1.Canadian Wildlife ServiceNational Wildlife Research CenterOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations