Summary
Liberal arts education in general, and liberal arts mathematics in particular, has a long history in American education, but since 1972 enrollments in liberal arts mathematics in the two-year colleges have dropped from 72,000 to a low of 19,000 in 1981. This paper explores some of the reasons for this decline and then looks toward the future and asks the question, “Can or should the old ‘great ideas’ mathematics course be revitalized to fit the needs of the students in the 1980s?” The thesis put forth in this paper is that it can be revitalized, but only if it takes on new form and includes a new orientation. The old liberal arts course will not only need to be modified to fit the career- oriented student, but also will need to integrate basic mathematics competencies including new technologies and be organized around the great ideas concept, rather than around specific basic skills. Liberal arts mathematics is an important course in the mathematics curriculum, and should continue to be taught. The liberal arts course should not have a fixed content, but should offer a variety of topics from which individual classes and instructors can choose. This choice should include statistics, computers, and discrete topics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Cohen, Authur M. and Brawer, Florence B., The American Community College(San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1982), p. 283.
Ibid., p. 304
Conference Board of Mathematics Sciences (CBMS), Report of the Survey Committee 1981 Community, Junior, and Technical College Directory, American Association of Community and Junior Colleges, One Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 and p. 74. (Washington: The Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences, Report of The Survey Committee, Vol. VI, 1981 ), p. 83.
Conference Board of Mathematics Sciences (CBMS), Report of the Survey Committee Projections of Education Statistics to 1986-87and Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences questionnaire data for 1980. (Washington: The Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences, Report of The Survey Committee, Vol. VI, 1981 ), p. 83.
Fey, James T., Albers, Donald J., and Fleming, Wendell H., Undergraduate Mathematical Science in Universities, Four-Year Colleges, and Two-Year Colleges, 1980-81, Volume VI(Washington: Conference Board of The Mathematical Sciences, Report of the Survey Committee, Vol. VI, 1981 ), p. 83.
Hurn, C. J., “The Prospects for Liberal Education: A Sociological Perspective,” Phi Delta Kappan, 1979, Vol. 60, No. 9, p. 632.
Koos, E. L., The Junior College, ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1924 ), p. 29.
Ralston, Anthony and Young, Gail S., The Future of College Mathematics, ( New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983 ) p. 43.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smith, K. (1985). Liberal Arts Mathematics— Cornerstone or Dinosaur ?. In: Albers, D.J., Rodi, S.B., Watkins, A.E. (eds) New Directions in Two-Year College Mathematics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5116-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5116-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9571-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5116-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive