Abstract
One of the most intriguing aspects of the assignment of blame is the contrast between the apparent simplicity of the everyday assertion or avoidance of blame and the complexity of the theoretical structure needed to account for the process of assigning blame. On the one hand, it is a rare child whose early repertoire of sentences does not include “It isn’t my fault!” and the companion “You did it.” On the other hand, a theoretical analysis of blame assignment involves sophisticated questions about events, their causes, and the dimensions of personal responsibility. Is this contrast merely an example of complexity invented as a substitute for clear thinking? Or are the distinctions drawn to this point really necessary for a complete understanding of the process?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shaver, K.G. (1985). A Theory of Blame. In: The Attribution of Blame. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5094-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5094-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9561-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5094-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive