Editor’s Introduction: The Road to Jerusalem

  • David Canter
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)


Given the nature of Facet Theory and the range of locations of its practitioners as well as the variety of settings in which it is practiced, contributions to this area of activity derive from a diverse group of people. It therefore seems appropriate to commence this book with a somewhat personal account of the particular motivations which have lead one facet activist to become involved in the practice and promulgation of the facet approach. There are no special reasons why I, rather than any of the other contributors to this volume, should write this chapter except that as the editor of the book I have perhaps more of an obligation to express my personal motivations.


Scientific Activity Personal Motivation Repertory Grid Facet Theory Conventional Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armistead, N. (Ed.). (1974). Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth: Penquin.Google Scholar
  2. Bartram, D. (1980). Do you really need your null hypothesis? British Psychological Society Bulletin, 33, 318 – 321.Google Scholar
  3. Borg, I. (1977). Some basic concepts of facet theory. In J. Lingoes (Ed.), Geometric representations of relational data(pp. 65 – 102 ). Ann Arbor: Mathesis.Google Scholar
  4. Canter, D. (1983). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality and Quantity, 17, 35 – 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, R.P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Education Review, 48(3), 378 – 399.Google Scholar
  6. Gratch, H. (Ed.). (1973). 25 years of social research in Israel. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Guttman, L. (1971). Measurement as structural theory. Psychometrika, 36, 329 – 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guttman, L. (1977). What is not what in statistics. The Statistician, 26, 81 – 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harre, R., & Secord, P. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Lingoes, J. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Michigan: Mathesis.Google Scholar
  12. Lingoes, J. (1981). Testing regional hypotheses in multidimensional scaling. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why(pp. 280 – 310 ). Arbor: Mathesis.Google Scholar
  13. Reason, P. & Rowan, J. (Eds.). Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Shye, S. (Ed.). (1978). Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Stouffer, S.A. et al. (1950). Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  16. Westland, G. (1978). Current crises of psychology, London: Heineman Educational.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Canter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations