The Merging of Disciplines: New Directions in Pure, Applied, and Computational Mathematics pp 185-196 | Cite as

# Newton’s Method Estimates from Data at One Point

## Abstract

Newton’s method and its modifications have long played a central role in finding solutions of non-linear equations and systems. The work of Kantorovich has been seminal in extending and codifying Newton’s method. Kantorovich’s approach, which dominates the literature in this area, has these features: (a) weak differentiability hypotheses are made on the system, e.g., the map is *C* ^{2} on some domain in a Banach space; (b) derivative bounds are supposed to exist over the whole of this domain. In contrast, here strong hypotheses on differentiability are made; analyticity is assumed. On the other hand, we deduce consequences from data at a single point. This point of view has valuable features for computation and its theory. Theorems similar to ours could probably be deduced with the Kantorovich theory as a starting point; however, we have found it useful to start afresh.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]J. Dieudonné,
*Foundations of Modern Analysis*, Academic Press, New York, 1960.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [2]W. Gregg and R. Tapia, “Optimal error bounds for the Newton-Kantorovich theorem,”
*SIAM J. Numer. Anal.*,**11**(1974), 10–13.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [3]L. Kantorovich and G. Akilov,
*Functional Analysis in Normed*Spaces, MacMillan, New York, 1964.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [4]M. Kim, Ph.D. Thesis, City University of New York, to appear, 1985.Google Scholar
- [5]S. Lang,
*Real Analysis*, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [6]Ostrowski,
*Solutions of Equations in Euclidean and Banach Spaces*, Academic Press, New York, 1973.Google Scholar - [7]L. Rail, “A note on the convergence of Newton’s method,”
*SIAM J. Numer. Anal*,**11**(1974), 34–36.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [8]J. Renegar, “On the efficiency of Newton’s method in approximating all zeroes of a system of complex polynomials,”
*Mathematics of Operations Research*, to appear.Google Scholar - [9]M. Shub and S. Smale, “Computational complexity: on the geometry of polynomials and a theory of cost, part I,”
*Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 4 serie t*,**18**(1985), 107–142.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [10]M. Shub and S. Smale, “Computational complexity: on the geometry of polynomials and a theory of cost, part II,”
*SIAM J. Computing*,**15**(1986), 145–161.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]S. Smale, “The fundamental theorem of algebra and complexity theory,”
*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)*, 4 (1981), 1–36.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [12]S. Smale, “On the efficiency of algorithms of analysis,”
*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)*,**13**(1985), 87–121.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [13]J. Traub and H. Wozniakowski, “Convergence and complexity of Newton iteration for operator equations,”
*J. Assoc. Comp. Mach.*,**29**(1979), 250–258.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar