Abstract
Social scientists never have access to true experimental data of the type sometimes available to laboratory scientists.1 Our inability to use laboratory methods to independently vary treatments to eliminate or isolate spurious channels of causation places a fundamental limitation on the possibility of objective knowledge in the social sciences. In place of laboratory experimental variation, social scientists use subjective thought experiments. Assumptions replace data. In the jargon of modern econometrics, minimal identifying assumptions are invoked.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Amemiya, T. (1981). “Qualitative response models: A survey.” J. Econ. Lit., 19, 1483–1536.
Ashenfelter, O. (1978). “Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings.” Rev. Econ. Statist., 60, 47–57.
Barnow, B., Cain, G., and Goldberger, A. (1980). “Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias.” In E. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (eds.), Evaluation Studies, vol. 5. San Francisco: Sage.
Barros, R. (1986). Three Essays on Selection and Identification Problems in Economics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Bassi, L. (1983). Estimating the Effect of Training Programs with Nonrandom Selection. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Chamberlain, G. (1982). “Multivariate regression models for panel data.” J. Econometrics, 18, 1–46.
Coleman, J.C. (1985). “Schools, families and children.” Ryerson Lecture, University of Chicago, April 1985.
Cox, D.R. The Planning of Experiments. New York: John Wiley, (1958).
Dawid, A.P. (1979). “Conditional independence in statistical theory” (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 41, 1–31.
Fienberg, S., Singer, B., and Tanur, J. (1985). “Large-scale social experimentation inthe United States.” In A.C. Atkinson and S. Fienberg (eds.), A Celebration of Statistics. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.
Fisher, R.A. (1953). The Design of Experiments. London: Hafner.
Goldfeld, S. and Quandt, R. (1976). “Techniques for estimating switching regressions.” In S. Goldfeld and R. Quandt (eds.), Studies in Nonlinear Estimation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
Heckman, J. (1976). “Simultaneous equations models with continuous and discrete endogenous variables and structural shifts.” In S. Goldfeld and R. Quandt (eds.), Studies in Nonlinear Estimation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
Heckman, J. “Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equations system.” Econometrica, 46, 931–961.
Heckman, J. (1979). “Sample selection bias as a specification error.” Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
Heckman, J. (1980). “Addendum to sample selection bias as a specification error.” In E. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (eds.), Evaluation Studies, vol. 5. San Francisco: Sage.
Heckman, J. and Neumann, G. (1977). “Union wage differentials and the decision to join unions.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Heckman, J. and Robb, R. (1985). “Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions.” In J. Heckman and B. Singer (eds.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data., New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–245.
Heckman, J. and Wolpin, K. (1976). “Does the contract compliance program work?: An analysis of Chicago data.” Indust. Labor Relations Rev., 19, 415–433.
Lee, L.F. (1978). “Unionism and wage rates: A simultaneous equations model with qualitative and limited dependent variables.” Intl. Econ. Rev., 19, 415–433.
Little, R.J. (1985). “A note about models for selectivity bias.” Econometrica, 53 (6), 1469–1474.
MaCurdy, T. (1982). “The use of time series processes to model the error structure of earnings in a longitudinal data analysis.” J. Econometrics, 18 (1), 83–114.
Manski, C. and Lerman, S. (1977). “The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples.” Econometrica, 45, 1977–1988.
Manski, C. and McFadden, D. (1981). “Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis.” In C. Manski and D. McFadden (eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 117–136.
Mundlak, Y. (1961). “Empirical production functions free of management bias.” J. Farm Econometrics, 43, 45–56.
Mundlak, Y. (1978). “On the pooling of time series and cross section data.” Econometrica, 46, 69–85.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983). “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.” Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1985). “Constructing a control group using multivariate sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score.” Amer. Statist., 39 (1), 33–38.
Roy, A. (1951). “Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings.” Oxford Econ. Pap., 3, 135–146.
Rubin, D. (1977). “Formalizing subjective notions about the effects of nonrespondents in sample surveys.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 72 (359), 538–543.
Scheuren, F. (1985). “Evaluating manpower training: Some notes on data handling issues.” Report to JTLS Panel, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.
Simon, H. (1957). “Spurious correlation: A causal interpretation.” In H. Simon (ed.), Models of Man. New York: John Wiley, 37–49.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heckman, J.J., Robb, R. (1986). Alternative Methods for Solving the Problem of Selection Bias in Evaluating the Impact of Treatments on Outcomes. In: Wainer, H. (eds) Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4976-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4976-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9381-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4976-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive