Skip to main content

Selection Modeling Versus Mixture Modeling with Nonignorable Nonresponse

  • Chapter
Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples

Abstract

It is sometimes suspected that nonresponse to a sample survey is related to the primary outcome variable. This is the case, for example, in studies of income or of alcohol consumption behaviors. If nonresponse to a survey is related to the level of the outcome variable, then the sample mean of this outcome variable based on the respondents will generally be a biased estimate of the population mean. If this outcome variable has a linear regression on certain predictor variables in the population, then ordinary least squares estimates of the regression coefficients based on the responding units will generally be biased unless nonresponse is a stochastic function of these predictor variables. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the performance of two alternative approaches, the selection model approach and the mixture model approach, for obtaining estimates of means and regression estimates when nonresponse depends on the outcome variable. Both approaches extend readily to the situation when values of the outcome variable are available for a subsample of the nonrespondents, called “follow-ups.” The availability of follow-ups are a feature of the example we use to illustrate comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Bergstrand, R., Vedin, A., Wilhelmsson, C, and Wilhelmsen, L. (1983). “Bias due to non-participation and heterogeneous sub-groups in population surveys.” J. Chron. Disease, 36, 725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossé, R., Ekerdt, D.J., and Silbert, J.E. (1984). “The Veterans Administration normative aging study.” In S.A. Mednick, M. Harvey, and K.M. Finello (eds.), Handbook of Longitudinal Research: Volume II. Teenage and Adult Cohorts. New York: Praeger, 273–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.B. and Midanik, L. (1982). “Alcohol use and alcohol problems among U.S. adults: Results of the 1979 national survey.” In Alcohol and Health Monograph No. 1, Alcohol Consumption and Related Problems. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P.J. and Rabinowitz, P. (1984). Methods of Numerical Integration, 2nd edn. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Lint, J. and Schmidt, W. (1976). “Alcohol and mortality.” In B. Kissin and H. Begleiter (eds.), The Biology of Alcoholism: Volume IV. Social Aspects of Alcoholism. New York: Plenum, 275–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W.J. (ed.) (1981). BMDP Statistical Software 1981. Berkeley: University of California Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, R.J., Bouchard, G.R., Locastro, J.S., and Laird, N.M. (1985). “Aging and generational effects on drinking behaviors in men: Results from the normative aging study.” Am. J. Public Health, 75, 1413–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlees, J.S., Reece, W.S., and Zieschang, K.D. (1982). “Imputation of missing values when the probability of response depends on the variable being imputed.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 77, 251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H. and Hurwitz, W.N. (1946). “The problem of nonresponse in sample surveys.” /. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 41, 517–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. (1974). “Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply.” Econometrica, 42, 679–694

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. (1976). “The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.” Annals Econ. Soc. Meas, 5, 475–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. (1979). “Sample bias as a specification error.” Econometrica, 47, 153–162

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. and Robb, R. (1985). “Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions.” In J.J. Heckman and B. Singer (eds.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.N. and Rubin, D.B. (1983). “Using multiple imputations to handle nonresponse in sample surveys.” In W.G. Madow, L Olkin, and D.B. Rubin (eds.), Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Volume 2. Theory and Bibliogra­phies New York: Academic Press, 209–245

    Google Scholar 

  • International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries (1982). “Zeros and extrema; linear programming.” In International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries 9. Houston: International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.F. (1979). “Identification and estimation in binary choice models with limited (censored) dependent variables.” Econometrica, 47, 977–996

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R.J.A. (1982). “Models for nonresponse in sample surveys.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 77, 237–250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J., Newstead, S., and Olsen, R.J. (1985). “Comparing public and private schools: The puzzling role of selectivity bias.” J. Bus. Econ. Statist, 3, 23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, R. (1982). Bias Due to Logistic Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Ph.D. thesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R.L. (1980). “A least squares correction for selectivity bias.” Econometrica, 48, 1815–1820

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1977). “Formalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonrespon- dents in sample surveys ” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 72, 538–543

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1978). “Multiple imputations in sample surveys—A phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse.” In Imputation and Editing of Faulty or Missing Data Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Social Security Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1985). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (1982). SAS User’s Guide: Basics. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glynn, R.J., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B. (1986). Selection Modeling Versus Mixture Modeling with Nonignorable Nonresponse. In: Wainer, H. (eds) Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4976-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4976-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9381-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4976-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics