Advertisement

Message Elaboration versus Peripheral Cues

  • Richard E. Petty
  • John T. Cacioppo
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

It is now clear that a wide variety of variables can affect a person’s motivation and/or ability to consider issue-relevant arguments in either a relatively objective or in a relatively biased manner. However, according to the ELM, extensive issue and argument processing is only one route to persuasion or resistance. When people are relatively unmotivated or unable to process issue-relevant arguments, attitude changes may still occur if peripheral cues are present in the persuasion situation. In fact, the ELM postulates a tradeoff between argument processing and the operation of peripheral cues: as argument scrutiny (whether objective or biased) is reduced, peripheral cues become relatively more important determinants of persuasion, but as argument scrutiny (whether objective or biased) is increased, peripheral cues become relatively less important. In the first part of this chapter we discuss the tradeoff between relatively objective processing and the operation of cues, and in the second part of this chapter we discuss the tradeoff as it applies to biased processing.

Keywords

Nonverbal Behavior Personal Relevance Argument Quality Source Expertise Weak Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Petty
    • 1
  • John T. Cacioppo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations