Differences in Social Exchange Between Intimate and Other Relationships: Gradually Evolving or Quickly Apparent?

  • John H. Berg
  • Margaret S. Clark
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

Interpersonal attraction has long been of considerable interest to social psychologists. Much of the work in this area, however, has been of the “one-shot” variety, focusing on factors influencing initial attraction between strangers. Social psychologists, for instance, have studied how proximity, similarity, physical attractiveness, and equity influence strangers’ initial attraction toward one another. Recently, some investigators have argued that close relationships such as friendships or romantic relationships are so different from casual ones that little of what has been gleaned from the study of initial attraction will be of use in understanding them (e.g., Levinger & Snoek, 1972; Murstein, Cerreto, & MacDonald; Rubin, 1973). Such criticisms, whether or not they turn out to be correct, highlight the importance of social psychologists addressing themselves more fully to understanding the dynamics of close friendships and how people become close. If whatever it is that distinguishes close from not close relationships develops very gradually, perhaps it is true that studying people who have just met will be of little importance to understanding the formation and dynamics of relationships such as friendships and romantic relationships. If, however, people make some fairly clear decisions about the nature of relationships early on, then one can argue that studying initial impressions and behavior is important to the study of close relationships.

Keywords

Glean 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R.A. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. Carrol & J. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 33–46 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, I., &, Haythorn, W.W. (1965). Interpersonal exchange in isolation. Sociometry, 23, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman, I., & Taylor, D.A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B.B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 107–160 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, J.H. (1983). Attraction in relationships: As it begins so it goes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, J.H. (1984). The development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1980). Disclosure or concern: A second look at liking for the norm-breaker. Journal of Personality, 48, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1982). Responses to self-disclosure and interaction goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, J.H., & Archer, RL. (1983). The disclosure-liking relationship: Effects of self-perception, order of disclosure, and topical similarity. Human Communication Research, 10, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg, J.H., Blaylock, T., Camarillo, J., & Steck, L. ( 1985, March). Taking another’s outcomes into consideration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Altanta.Google Scholar
  11. Berg, J., & Miller, L. (1985). The timing of responsive acts.. Unpublished manuscript, University of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  12. Berscheid, E., Dion, K.K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, R.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Bolton, C.D. (1961). Mate selection as the development of a relationship. Marriage and Family Living 23, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Braiker, H.B., & Kelley, H.H. (1979). Conflict in the development of Close relationships. In R.L. Burgess & T.L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, M.S. (1981). Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, M.S. (1983). Some implications of close social bonds for help seeking. In B.M. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J.D. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping: Vol. 2. Help seeking (pp. 205–229 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, M.S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, M.S. (in press). Evidence for the effectiveness of manipulations of desire for communal versus exchange relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, M.S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, M.S., Ouellette, R, & Milberg, S. ( 1984, July). Recipient mood, relationship type and helping. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Interpersonal Relationships, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, M.S., & Vanderlipp, B. (in press). Perceptions of exploitation in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.Google Scholar
  23. Dabbs, J.H. Uwanna, R, Evans, M., & Bakeman, R. (1982). Getting acquainted: Patterns of speech and gaze. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 63 (MS 2090).Google Scholar
  24. Darley, J.M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking as a result of anticipation of personal contact. Human Relations. 20, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, D. (1982). Determinants of responsiveness in dyadic interactions. In W. Ickes & E.G. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior (pp. 85–140 ). New York: Springer-Verlag ).Google Scholar
  26. Davis, D., & Perkowitz, W.T. (1979). Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interactions: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, K.E., & Todd, M.J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships In K.E. Davis & T.O. Mitchell (Eds.), Advances in Psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 79–122 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, K.E., & Todd, M.J. (in press). Assesing friendships: Prototypes, Paradigm cases, and relationship assesment. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Sage Series in Personal Relationships (Vol. 1). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  29. DePaulo, B.M., Leiphart, V., & Dull, W.R. (in press). Helping seeking and social interaction: Person, situation and process considerations. In E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Reykowski, & J. Karylowski (Eds.), The Development and maintenance of pro-social behavior. Newe York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  30. Derlega, V.J., Wilson, M., & Chaikin, A.L. (1976). Friendship and disclosure reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 578–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  32. Fisher, J.D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reaction to aid: A conceptual review. Psychological Bulletin, 9, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Foa, U.G., & Foa, E.B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  34. Grifitt, W. (1970). Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: Ambient effective temperature and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1983). Equity theory and recipient reactions to aid. In J.D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping: Vol 1. Recipient reactions (pp. 113–141 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Hays, R.B. (1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hays, R.B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keiser, G.J., & Altman, I. (1976). Relationship of nonverbal behavior to the social penetration process. Human Communication Research, 2, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelley, H.H. (1979). Close relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J.H., Huston, T.L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D.R. (1983). Close relationships. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  41. Kerckhoff, AC., & Davis, K.E. (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klinger, E. (1977). Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people’s lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lerner, M.J., Miller, D.T., & Holmes, J.G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 134–163 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Levinger, G. (1979). A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships. In R.L. Burgess & T.L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 169–196 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Levinger, G., (1983). Development and change, In H.H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, R.L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L.A. Peplau, & D.R. Peterson, Close relationships (pp. 315–359 ). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  46. Levinger, G., Senn, D.J., & Jorgensen, B.W. (1970). Progress toward permanence in courtship: A test of the Kerkoff-David hypothesis. Sociometry, 33, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levinger, G., & Snoek, J.D. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  48. Miller, L.C., & Berg, J.H. (1984). Selectivity and urgency in interpersonal exchange. In V.J. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 161–205 ). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, L.C., Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, L.C., Berg, J.H., & Rugs, D. ( 1984, September). Selectivity in exchange: When you give me what I need. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  51. Mills, J., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121–144 ). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Morton, T.L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murstein, B.I. (1970). Stimulus-value-role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murstein, B.I. (1972). Physical attractiveness and marital choice. Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Murstein, B.I., Cerreto, M., & MacDonald, M.G. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintanceship process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preno, B.E., & Stiles, W.B. (1983). Familiarity in verbal interactions of married couples versus strangers. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Purvis, J. A, Dabbs, J.M., & Hopper, C.H. (1984). The “opener”: Skilled user of facial expression and speech pattern. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  60. Rubin, Z., & Levinger, G. (1974). Theory and data badly mated: A critique of Murstein’s SVR theory and Lewis’s PDF model of mate selection. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development John H. Berg and Margaret S. Clark of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Segal, M.W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sholar, W., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Deciding in communal relationships: By consensus or should majority rule? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  64. Snyder, N., & Swann, W.B. (1978). Hypothesis testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Snyder, M., Tanke, E.D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swann, W.B., & Read, S.H. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor, D.A. (1968). Some aspects of the development of interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. Journal of Social Psychology, 75, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, D.A, & Altman, I. (1975). Self-disclosure as a function of reward-cost outcomes. Sociometry, 38, 18–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, D.A., Altman, I., & Sorrentino, R. (1969). Interpersonal exchange as a function of rewards and costs and situational factors: Expectancy confirmation-disconfirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 324–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tolstedt, B.E., & Stokes, J.P. (1984). Self-disclosure, intimacy and the depenetration process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tornblom, K.Y., & Fredholm, E.M. (1984). Attribution of friendship: The influence of the nature and comparability of resources given and received. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  73. Wegner, D.M., & Giuliano, T. (1982). The forms of social awareness. In W. J. Ickes & E.S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 165–198 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  74. Won-Doornick, M. (1979). On getting to know you: The association between stage of relationship and reciprocity of self-disclosure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zadny, J., & Gerard, H.B. (1974). Attributed intentions of informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Berg
  • Margaret S. Clark

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations