Advertisement

A Comparison of Two Methods Designed to Rapidly Estimate Thresholds of Rewarding Brain Stimulation

  • George Fouriezos
  • Edward Nawiesniak

Abstract

Four experiments evaluated the relative merits of two procedures for rapidly estimating thresholds of rewarding brain stimulation. In the first method termed autotitration, rats earned brain stimulation by pressing a lever, and the stimulation became progressively weaker in pulse frequency with continued responding. The depression of a second Lever restored the stimulation to its original strength. In the second protocol or timed method, rats worked through the same descending sequence of frequencies and eventually quit responding but, here, they had no control over resets of stimulation; resets were automatically triggered at timed intervals by the equipment. Experiment 1 showed that autotitration consistently produced higher reset thresholds than the threshold estimates of the timed method. The second experiment showed that autotitration’s reset thresholds climbed when the stimulation sequence began at twice the customary frequency but that thresholds derived from the timed method remained at control levels with this double-frequency test. Reset thresholds from autotitration were found in Experiment 3 to be strongly influenced by changes in only the first frequency of the sequence, but this manipulation had no effect on timed-method estimates. Finally, the last experiment illustrated how autotitration might miss or seriously underestimate the effect of a pharmacological treatment. Together, these data suggest that resets made in autotitration are influenced by the value of the reinforcer made available immediately after the reset but that the alternative, timed method, is free of this problem.

Keywords

Brain Stimulation Pulse Frequency Threshold Estimate Initial Frequency Msec Pulse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bielajew, C., & Shizgal, P. (1982). Behaviorally derived measures of conduction velocity for rewarding medial forebrain bundle stimulation. Brain Research, 237, 107–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corbett, D., Stellar, J. R., Stinus, L., Kelley, A., & Fouriezos, G. (1983). Time course of alpha-flupenthixol action explains “response artifacts” of neuroleptic action on brain stimulation reward. Science, 222, 1251–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Groot, J. (1959). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  4. Gallistel, C. R., Shizgal, P., & Yeomans, J. S. (1981). A portrait of the substrate for self-stimulation. Psychological Review, 88, 228–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardner, E. L. (1971). An improved technique for determining brain reward thresholds in primates. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 3, 273–274.Google Scholar
  6. Leith, N. J. (1983). Effects of apomorphine on self-stimulation responding: Does the drug mimic the current? Brain Research, 277, 129–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leith, N. J., & Barrett, R. J. (1980). Effects of chronic amphetamine or reserpine on self-stimulation responding: Animal model of depression? Psychopharmaco1ogy, 72, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leith, N. J., & Barrett, R. J. (1981). Self-stimulation and amphetamine: Tolerance to d and l isomers and cross tolerance to cocaine and methylphenidate. Psychopharmaco1ogy, 74, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liebman, J. M. (1983). Discriminating between reward and performance: A critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 7, 45–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mundl, W. J. (1980). A constant current stimulator. Physiology & Behavior, 24, 991–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nazzaro, J., & Gardner, E. L. (1980). GABA antagonism lowers self-stimulation thresholds in the ventral tegmental area. Brain Research, 189, 279–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nazzaro, J. M., Seeger, T. F., & Gardner, E. L. (1981). Morphine differentially affects ventral tegmental and substantia nigra brain reward thresholds. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 14, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neill, D. B., Gaar, L. A., Clark, A. S., & Britt, M. D. (1982). “Rate-free” measures of self-stimulation and microinjections: Evidence toward a new concept of dopamine and reward. In B. G. Hoebel & D. Novin (Eds.), The neural basis of feeding and reward (pp. 289–297). Brunswick, ME: Haer Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Neill, D. B., & Justice, J. B., Jr. (1981). An hypothesis for a behavioral function of dopaminergic transmission in nucleus accumbens. In R. B. Chronister & J. F. DeFrance (Eds.), The neurobiology of the nucleus accumbens (pp. 338–347). Brunswick, ME: Haer Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Schaefer, G. J., Baumgardner, D. G., & Michael, R. P. (1979). Constant-current, biphasic titrating stimulator for brain self-stimulation. Physiology & Behavior, 22, 1217–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaefer, G. J., & Holtzman, S. G. (1979). Free-operant and auto-titration brain self-stimulation procedures in the rat: A comparison of drug effects. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 10, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schaefer, G. J., & Michael, R. P. (1980). Acute effects of neuroleptics on brain self-stimulation thresholds in rats. Psychopharmacology, 67, 9–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seeger, T. F., & Gardner, E. L. (1979). Enhancement of self-stimulation behavior in rats and monkeys after chronic neuroleptic treatment: Evidence for mesolimbic supersensitivity. Brain Research, 175, 49–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stein, L. (1961). Inhibitory effects of phenothiazine compounds on self-stimulation of the brain. Diseases of the Nervous System, 22(Suppl.), 1–5.Google Scholar
  20. Stein, L. (1962). Effects and interactions of imipramine, chlorpromazine, reserpine, and amphetamine on self-stimulation: Possible neurophysiological basis of depression. In J. Wortis (Ed.), Recent advances in biological psychiatry (pp. 288–308). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stein, L., & Ray, O. S. (1960). Brain stimulation reward “thresholds” self-determined in rat. Psychopharmacologia, 1, 251–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Valenstein, E. S. (1964). Problems of measurement and interpretation with reinforcing brain stimulation. Psychological Review, 71, 415–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zarevics, P., & Setler, P. E. (1979). Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: Evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms. Brain Research, 169, 499–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zarevics, P., & Setler, P. E. (1981). Effects of GABAergic drugs on brain stimulation reward as assessed by a ‘threshold’ method. Brain Research, 215, 201–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Fouriezos
    • 1
  • Edward Nawiesniak
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations