Place Conditioning: A Simple and Effective Method for Assessing the Motivational Properties of Drugs
The advantages of the place conditioning paradigm for assessing the reinforcing properties of drugs are presented from historical, procedural, and parametric viewpoints. The importance of employing a “balanced” paradigm is emphasized. The potential of the paradigm to answer basic questions concerning the neural bases of motivation is outlined with examples.
KeywordsConditioned Place Preference Place Preference Aversive Effect Opiate Receptor Pharmacology Biochemistry
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1969). The reward value of indifferent stimulation. In J. T. Tapp (Ed.), Reinforcement and behavior (pp. 179–214). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Black, R. W., Albiniak, T., Davis, M., & Schumpert, J. (1973). A preference in rats for cues associated with intoxication. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 423–424.Google Scholar
- Rossi, N. A., & Reid, L. D. (1976). Affective states associated with morphine injections. Physiological Psychology, 4, 269–274.Google Scholar
- Stapleton, J. M., Lind, M. D., Merriman, V. J., Bozarth, M. A., & Reid, L. A. (1979). Affective consequences and subsequent effects in morphine self-administration of D-Ala2-methionine enkephalin. Physiological Psychology, 7, 146–152.Google Scholar
- Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Valentino, R. J., Herling, S., Medzihradshy, F., Merz, H., & Woods, J. H. (1981). Quarternary naltrexone: Evidence for the central mediation of discriminative stimulus effects of narcotic agonists and antagonists. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 219, 652–659.Google Scholar