Abstract
Of all data collection procedures in the social sciences, the survey-interview is most frequently used (cf. Brown & Glimartin, 1969; Wahlke, 1979). Considerable doubt has been expressed, however, concerning the validity and reliability of the information it yields (e.g., Phillips, 1971). The term “response effects” refers to the effects of variables that influence or distort the responses, such as the race of the Interviewer, the social desirability of the response alternatives provided, or the way questions are formulated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bower, G.H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist. 36. 129–148.
Bower, G.H. (1983). Affect and Cognition. London: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.
Brenner, M. (1982). Response effects of “role-restricted” characteristics of the interviewer. In W. Dijkstra & J. van der Zouwen (Eds), Response Behavior in the Survey-interview. London: Academic Press.
Brown, J.S., a Gilmartin, B.G. (1969). Sociology today: Lacunae, emphases and surfeit. American Sociologist. 4, 283–291.
Cannell, C.F., & Kahn, R.L. (1968) Interviewing. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds), The Handbook: of Social Psychology. Vol. II, 2nd edition. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
Cannell, C.F., Lawson S.A., a Hausser, D.L. (1975). A Technique for Evaluating Interviewer Performance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Denzin, N.V. (1970). The Research Act; A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine.
Dijkstra, W. (1983). Beinvloeding van Antwoorden in Survey-interviews Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.
Dijkstra, W., & van der Zouwen, J. (Eds) (1982). Response Behavior in the Survey-interview. London/New York: Academic Press.
Forgas, J.P., Bower, G.H., & Krantz, S.E. (in press). The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Henson, R.M. (1974). Effects of instructions and verbal modeling in a survey interview setting. Social Science Research. 3. 323–342.
Henson, R.M., Cannell, C.F., & Lawson, S. (1976). Effects of interviewer style on quality of reporting in a survey interview. The Journal of Psychology. 93. 221–227.
Henson, R.M., Cannell C.F., & Lawson, S. (1979). An experiment in interviewer style and questionnaire form. In C.F. Cannell, L. Oksenberg & J.M. Converse (Eds), Experiments in Interviewing Techniques. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Oksenberg, L., Vinokur A., & Cannell, C.F. (1979). The effects of commitment to being a good respondent on interview performance. In C.F. Cannell, L. Oksenberg & J.M. Converse (Eds), Experiments In interviewing Techniques, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Phillips, D.L. (1971). Knowledge from what?. Chicago: Rand McNaily.
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N.M. (1974). Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
Wahlke, J.C. (1979). Pre-behavioralism in political science. The American Political Science Review, 73, 9–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dijkstra, W., van der Zouwen, J. (1987). Styles of Interviewing and the Social Context of the Survey-Interview. In: Hippler, HJ., Schwarz, N., Sudman, S. (eds) Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4798-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4798-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96570-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4798-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive