Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering ((STELE))

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

The communication detection systems discussed thus far have been describable in terms of deciding between a simple hypothesis and a simple alternative. In this section we shall consider binary decision rules which are describable in terms of a composite hypothesis versus a composite alternative. More precisely, by simple hypothesis is meant that under the assumed hypothesis the probability distribution of the test data is completely specified. When the assumed hypothesis does not specify completely the probability distribution of the obtained data, the hypothesis is called composite. Composite-hypothesis testing for binary systems results in a generality in that the signal space is partitioned into two disjoint subsets Ω 0 and Ω 1, each of which may contain an arbitrarily large number of signals. For examples, Ω 0 may consist of a class of time waveforms characterized by an unknown parameter, say s 0(t;m, where m is an unknown random variable or vector; the same is true for Ω 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Helstrom, C.: “Statistical Theory of Signal Detection,” Pergamon Press, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Middleton, D.: “Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory,” McGrawHill, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hancock, J. C., and P. A. Wintz: “Signal Detection Theory,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Viterbi, A. J.: “Principles of Coherent Communication,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wosencraft, J. M., and I. M. Jacobs: “Principles of Communication Engineering,” Wtley, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bussgang, J. J., and M. Leiter: Error Rate Approximation for Differential Phase-Shift Keying, IEEE Trans. Commun. Systems, vol. CS-2, pp. 18–27, March, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bussgang, J. J., and M. Leiter: Phase Shift Keying with a Transmitted Reference, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., vol. Com 14, no. 1, pp. 14–22, February, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wainstein, L. A., and Zubakov, V. D.: “Extraction of Signals from Noise,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weber, C.L. (1987). Binary Composite-hypothesis Testing. In: Elements of Detection and Signal Design. Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4774-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4774-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9150-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4774-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics