Advertisement

An Examination Of The Recovery Value Of Various Restbreak Durations For An Analytical Task

  • Thomas R. Huston
  • Richard L. Shell
  • O. Geoffrey Okogbaa
Chapter
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of restbreak duration upon the recovery patterns of subjects engaged in an analytical task. Eighteen males engaged twice in a five hour analytical task. The subjects received restbreaks every hour. The duration of the restbreaks was 5, 10, or 15 minutes. The results found that the restbreak duration was a significant factor in the recovery patterns of the subjects.

Keywords

Analytical Task Efficiency Level Knowledge Worker White Collar Worker Mental Fatigue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony, G.M. (1984). Designing Productivity STandards for White Collar Employees. Indus trial Engineering, 16, 76–81.Google Scholar
  2. Bechtold, S.E., R.E. Janaro, and D.L. Sumners (1984). Maximization of Labor Productivity Through Optimal Rest-break Schedules. Management Science, 30, 1442–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, C.A. (1976). Counteracting Psychological Fatigue Effects by Stimulus Change. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Human Factors Society Meeting.Google Scholar
  4. Bhatia, N. and K.F.H. Murrell (1969). An Industrial Experiment in Organized Rest Pauses. Human Factors, 11, 167–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brisley, C.L. and W. Fielder Jr. (1983). Measuring the ‘Unmeasurable’: Knowledge Worker Productivity. Indus trial Engineering, 1983, 15, 42–47.Google Scholar
  6. Cakir, A., D.S. Hart, and T.F.M. Stewart (1980). Visual Display Terminals, New York: John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, C. (1971). Fatigue Problems in Modern Industry. Ergonomics, 14, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, C. (1971). A Theory of Fatigue. Ergonomics, 16, 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbreth, F.B. and L.M. Gilbreth (1953). Fatigue Study. In Spriegel and Meyers (eds.) The Writings of Gilbreths. Homewood, I11.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  10. Haubart, A. (1954). Die Arbeitspause in Betrieb, Thalwill, Zurich.Google Scholar
  11. Janaro, R. E. (1985). A Study of the Reduction of Fatigue Impact on Productivity through Optimal Restbreak Scheduling. Human Factors, 27, 459–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Karger, D.W. and W.M. Hancock (1982). Advanced Work Measurement. New York: Industrial Press Inc.Google Scholar
  13. McFarland, R.A. (1971). Understanding Fatigue in Modern Life. Ergonomics, 14, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okogbaa, O.G. (1983). An Empirical Model for Mental Work Output and Fatigue. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati. 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Personick, V.A. (1983). The Job Outlook Through 1995: Industry Output and Employment Prospects. Monthly Labor Review, 24–36.Google Scholar
  16. Porter, A.L. (1984). Work Issues Raised by Office Automation Are Key I.E. Concerns. Indus t-rial Engineering, 16, 24–33.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, C. (1984). Awareness, Analysis/Measurement and Improvement Are the Vital Components of Productivity. Industrial Engineering, 16, 82–89.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, F.W. (1967). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  19. Vernon, H.M. and T. Bedford (1924). The Influence of Rest Pauses in Light Industrial Work. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Report No. 25, 1924.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas R. Huston
    • 1
  • Richard L. Shell
    • 1
  • O. Geoffrey Okogbaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations