Advertisement

Ambulatory ECG Monitoring: Real-Time Analysis Versus Tape Scanning Systems

  • Roger G. Mark
  • Kenneth L. Ripley
Part of the M. D. Computing: Benchmark Papers book series (MD COMPUTING)

Abstract

Long-term ambulatory monitoring of the electrocardiogram has become an important diagnostic technique. It is used to evaluate patients with known ventricular ectopic activity who may be at risk for sudden death; likewise, it is used to monitor patients after myocardial infarction, to evaluate patients with intermittent symptoms possibly due to cardiac arrhythmias, to document the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and to check the functioning of implanted cardiac pacemakers [1–9].

Keywords

Survival Technology Arrhythmia Detector Rhythm Strip Analog Tape Marquette Electronics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Corday E, Bazika V, Lang T, et al. Detection of phantom arrhythmias and evanescent electrocardiographic abnormalities: use of prolonged direct electrocardio-recording. JAMA 1965; 193:417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lown B, Calvert A, Armington R, et al. Monitoring for serious arrhythmias and high risk of sudden death. Circulation 1975; 52 (suppl. III): 189–98.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crawford M, O’Rourke R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise testing and Holter monitoring for detecting arrhythmias in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33:132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrison DC, Fitzgerald JW, Winkle RA. Ambulatory electrocardiography for diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1976; 294:373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kennedy HL, Caralis DG. Ambulatory electrocardiography: a clinical perspective. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87:729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Famularo MA, Kennedy HL. Ambulatory electrocardiography in the assessment of pacemaker function. Am Heart J 1982; 104:1086–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vismara LA, Vera Z, Foerster JM, et al. Identification of sudden death risk factors in acute and chronic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1977; 821:39.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michelson EL, Morganroth J. Spontaneous variability of complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by long-term electrocardiographic recording. Circulation 1980; 61:690.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison DC, Fitzgerald JW, Winkle RA. Contribution of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to antiarrhythmic management. Am J Cardiol 1978; 41:996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark RG, Moody GB, Olson WH, et al. Event recorders and future systems. In: Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringqvist L, eds. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1981: 113–32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salerno D, Hodges M, Granrud G, et al. Inaccuracy of commercial 24-hour ECG analyzers for quantitation of simple and complex ventricular arrhythmia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:597.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mark RG, Moody GB, Olson WH, et al. Real-time ambulatory arrhythmia analysis with a microcomputer. In: Computers in cardiology. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1979:57–62.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnold J. Time-domain filtering of electrocardiograms. S.B. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge, MA, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nolle FM. ARGUS, a clinical computer system for monitoring electrocardiographic rhythms. D.Sc. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lovelace DE, Knoebel SB, Zipes DP. Recognition of ventricular extrasystoles in sedentary vs. ambulatory populations. In: Computers in cardiology, 1978:9–12.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moody GB, Mark RG. Development and evaluation of a 2-lead ECG analysis program. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:39–44.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watanabe K, et al. Computer analysis of the exercise ECG: a review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980; 22:423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rappaport S, Gillick L, Moody G, et al. QRS morphology classification: quantitative evaluation of different strategies. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:33–8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ripley KL, Murray A. Introduction to automated arrhythmia detection. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1980.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas LJ, Clark KW, Mead CN, et al. Automated cardiac dysrhythmia analysis. Proc IEEE 1979; 67:309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliver GC, Ripley KL, Miller JP, et al. A critical review of computer arrhythmia detection. In: Pordy L, ed. Computer electrocardiography: current status and criteria. Mt. Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Co., 1977:319–60.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cox JR, Nolle FM, Arthur RM. Digital analysis of the electroencephalogram, the blood pressure wave, and the electrocardiogram. Proc IEEE 1972; 60:1137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ripley KL, Arthur RM. Evaluation and comparison of automatic arrhythmia detectors. In: Computers in cardiology, 1975:27–32.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feldman CL. Evaluation of arrhythmia detectors. In: Computers in cardiology, 1974:21–7.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cox JR, Hermes RE, Ripley KL. Evaluation of performance. In: Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringqvist I, eds. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1981:183–98.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schluter P, Mark R, Moody G, et al. Performance measures for arrhythmia detectors. In: Computers in cardiology, 1980:267–70.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zeelenberg C, Meij SH. Evaluation and optimization of an existing arrhythmia detection system by using an annotated ECG database. In: Computers in cardiology, 1981:103–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang JY, Shaya MN, Helfenbein ED, et al. The design and evaluation of a real-time arrhythmia monitoring algorithm. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:363–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mark RG, Schluter PS, Moody G, et al. An annotated ECG database for evaluating arrhythmia detectors. In: Frontiers of engineering in health care—1982. Proc 4th Annual IEEE EMBS Soc Conf.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hermes RE, Oliver GC. Use of the American Heart Association database. In: Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringqvist I, eds. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1981:165–81.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hermes RE, Geselowitz DB, Oliver GC. Development, distribution and use of the American Heart Association database for ventricular arrhythmia detector evaluation. In: Computers in cardiology, 1980:263–6.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schluter PS, Peterson SK, Siegel LC, et al. A database for arrhythmia detector evaluation. Proc 31st ACEMB, 1978; 20:58.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database: tape directory and format specification. Biomedical Engineering Center for Clinical Instrumentation, Technical Report No. 010, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, 1980.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kennedy HL, Sprague MK, Shriver KK, et al. Real-time analysis Holter ECG—a new approach. Circulation 1982; 66(suppl. II): 74.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murphy B, Reilly D, Matthews M. The application of a standard ventricular arrhythmia tape database for determining the accuracy of a commercial high speed Holter analyzer. Irvine, CA: Del Mar Avionics Company, 1984.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stein IM, Plunkett J, Troy M. Comparison of techniques for examining long-term ECG recordings. Med Instrum 1980; 14:69–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomas LJ, Clark KW, Mead CN, et al. Supraventricular arrhythmias: strategies for detection. In: Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringqvist I, eds. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1981:213–32.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lovelace DE, Knoebel SB. Time series analysis in predicting ventricular arrhythmias. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:45–8.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Adam DR, Powell AO, Gordon H, et al. Ventricular fibrillation and fluctuations in the amplitude of the repolarization vector. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:241–4.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, et al. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 1981; 213:220–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mead CN, Pull HR, Clark KW, et al. Expanded frequency-do-main ECG waveform processing: integration into a new version of Argus/2H. In: Computers in cardiology, 1982:205–9.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schluter P, Clapham D, Mertens J, Mockaitis A, Mortara D. The design and evaluation of a computer based system for Holter tape analysis. In: Computers in cardiology, 1984 (in press).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mead CN, Clark KW, Piatt J, Thomas LJ. A decade of Argus algorithm enhancement: final evaluation results and implementation in a CMOS environment. In: Computers in cardiology, 1984 (in press).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Laister MJ, Riggs RJ. A comparison of template matching and feature extraction methods of ECG analysis. In: Computers in cardiology, 1984 (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger G. Mark
    • 1
  • Kenneth L. Ripley
    • 2
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering in MedicineMITUSA
  2. 2.Diagnostic Medical Instruments, Inc.East SyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations