Advertisement

Magnetic Resonance: The Second Revolution in Computer-Based Imaging

  • Douglas A. Ortendahl
Part of the M. D. Computing: Benchmark Papers book series (MD COMPUTING)

Abstract

The ability to peer inside the human body has been of immense value in medical science. For many years this need was filled by recording on film the differential absorption of x-rays by body structures. Although it was the mainstay of medical imaging for decades, plain film radiography cannot discriminate among overlapping structures. This deficiency has been remedied in the past decade by x-ray computed tomography (CT), which provides cross-sectional views of the human body, with significant diagnostic impact [1].

Keywords

Free Induction Decay Array Processor Plain Film Radiography Intrinsic Angular Momentum Compass Needle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parker DL, Clayton PD. Computed tomography: the revolution in computer based medical imaging. MD Computing 1984; 1(1):48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaufman L, Crooks LE, Margulis AR. Nuclear magnetic resonance in medicine. New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Margulis AR, Higgins CB, Kaufman L, Crooks LE, eds. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloch F. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 1946; 70:460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound RV. Resonance absorption by nuclear magnet movements in a solid. Phys Rev 1946; 69:127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1973; 242:190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar A, Welti D, Ernst RR. NMR Fourier zeugmatography. J Magn Res 1975; 18:69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelstein W, Hutchison J, Johnson G, et al. Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole body imaging. Phys Med Biol 1980; 25:751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crooks LE, Ortendahl DA, Kaufman L, et al. Clinical efficiency of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983; 146:123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crooks LE, Arakawa M, Hoenninger JC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: effects of magnetic field strength. Radiology 1984; 151:127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ortendahl DA, Hylton NM, Kaufman L, Crooks LE. Automated tissue characterization with NMR imaging. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Brussels, Belgium, 1983Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas A. Ortendahl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations