Teenage Pregnancies: Looking Ahead to 1984

  • Sara L. Tietze
  • Richard Lincoln


About 1.1 million teenagers are giving birth, obtaining abortions, or having miscarriages or stillbirths each year; another 200,000 are getting pregnant as teenagers, although the pregnancy outcome doesn’t occur until they are past 20. Few teenage pregnancies are intended; most occur outside of wedlock. The adverse health, social, psychological, and economic consequences of such pregnancies have received widespread publicity. Girls just turning 14, many of whom are beginning to risk pregnancy because they have become biologicOnliney fecund and have initiated sexual activity, will be 20 years old in 1984. Just how Orwellian is their adolescent reproductive future likely to be? How many will become mothers, obtain abortions, get pregnant while still in their teens? Aside from the very few 14 year olds who have already been pregnant, this is entirely an open question. If legal barriers (e.g., parental notification or consent laws) reduce the accessibility of contraception to teenagers, or if the proportion sexuOnliney active increases, or if more adolescents initiate sexual activity at younger ages, teenage pregnancies will be likely to increase. On the other hand, if teenagers’ contraceptive practices improve, if fewer become sexuOnliney active, or if initiation of sex is postponed, the number of pregnancies should be smOnlineer.


Pregnancy Rate Teenage Pregnancy Subsequent Pregnancy Legal Abortion Parental Notification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    National Center for Health Statistics, DHEW. Advance report: final mortality statistics, 1976. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 1978;26(12) Suppl: Table 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Abortion 1976–1977. Need and Services in the United States: Each State and Metropolitan Area. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control, DHEW. Abortion Surveillance, Annual Summary, 1976. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control, 1978, Table 6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., Table 7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tietze C. Repeat abortions: why more? Family Planning Perspectives 1978; 10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glick PC, Norton AJ. Marrying, divorcing, and living together in the U.S. today. Population B 1977; 32(5): Table 12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zelnik M, Kantner JF. Contraceptive patterns and premarital pregnancy among women aged 15 to 19 in 1976. Family Planning Perspectives 1978;10:135, Tables 11 and 16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zelnik M, Kantner JF. Sexual and contraceptive experience of young unmarried women in the United States, 1976 and 1971. Family Planning Perspectives 1977,9:55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S Bureau of Census. Marital status and living arrangements, March 1976. Current Population Reports 1977;Series P-20(306): Table 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zelnik M, Kantner JF, 1978. op cit., p. 142.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaughan B, Trussell J, Menken J, Jones EF. Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States, 1970–1973. Family Planning Perspectives 1977;9:251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah L. Tietze 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara L. Tietze
    • 1
  • Richard Lincoln
    • 2
  1. 1.New YorkUSA
  2. 2.The Alan Guttmacher InstituteNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations