Advertisement

River Discharge and Sediment Deposition in the Upper Pamlico Estuary

  • Jonathan D. Phillips
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Science and Society book series (CISS)

Abstract

A qualitative stability model was used to evaluate the Pamlico-Tar River system of North Carolina to determine possible impacts of upstream land use on sediment delivery to the estuary and the role of streamflow relative to other processes in defining the loci of sediment accumulation. Barring catastrophic or threshold-type changes in the watershed, rivers such as the Tar are dynamically stable with respect to sediment transport and storage. This suggests that fluvial sediment delivery to the estuary and fluvial influence on the geomorphology of the river/estuary transition zone will be relatively constant. Observed changes in upper-estuary sedimentation patterns should then be linked to changes in the coastal rather than the fluvial system. Because sediment yield/discharge relations are constant, and because tidal currents are negligible, wind-driven circulation determines the location of sediment accumulation within the boundary conditions defined by river flow. The interaction of wind-driven circulation and freshwater inflow creates a gradual, poorly defined river/estuary transition zone. The first step to understanding processes in the transition zone is tracking the movement of the river/estuary interface under various discharge and wind conditions.

Keywords

River Discharge Sediment Yield Sediment Deposition Sediment Delivery Sediment Budget 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Braun, M. 1983 Differential Equations and Their Applications. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Cesari, L. 1971 Asymptotic Behavior and Stability Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebietze, Band 16. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Froomer, N. L. 1980 Morphologic changes in some Chesapeake Bay tidal marshes resulting from accelerated soil erosion. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie suppl. 34:242–54.Google Scholar
  4. Giese, G. L., Wilder, H. B. Parker, G. G. 1979 Hydrology of Major Estuaries and Sounds of North Carolina. U.S. Geol. Surv. Wat. Res. Inv. 79–46.Google Scholar
  5. Gottschalk, L. C. 1945 Effects of soil erosion on navigation in upper Chesapeake Bay. Geog. Rev. 5:219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knox, J. C. 1977 Human impacts on Wisconsin stream channels. Assoc. Amer. Geog. Annals 67:323–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. May, R. M. 1973 Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Meade, R. H. 1982 Sources, sinks, and storage of river sediment in the Atlantic drainage of the United States. J. Geol. 90:235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillips, J. D. 1987 Sediment budget stability of the Tar River basin, North Carolina. Am. J. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Phillips, J. D. and Steila, D. 1984 Hydrologie equilibrium status of a disturbed watershed in eastern North Carolina. GeoJournal 9:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Renwick, W. H. Ashley, G. M. 1984 Sources, storages, and sinks of fine-grained sediments in a fluvial-estuarine system. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 95: 1343–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Simmons, C. E. 1976 Sediment characteristics of streams in the eastern piedmont and western coastal plain regions of North Carolina. U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper 1978–0:01–032.Google Scholar
  13. Simmons, H. B. Hermann, F. A. 1972 Effects of man-made works on the hydraulic, salinity, and shoaling regimens of estuaries. In Environmental Framework of Coastal Plain Estuaries. (B. Nelson, ed.), Geol. Soc, Am. Mem. 133, 555–570.Google Scholar
  14. Slingerland, R. 1981 Qualitative stability analysis of geologic systems with an example from river hydraulic geometry. Geology 9:491–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schroeder, W. W. 1978 Riverine influence on estuaries. In Estuarine Interactions (M. L. Wiley, ed.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 347–364.Google Scholar
  16. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1983 Upper Neuse River Erosion Study. U.S. SCS, Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar
  17. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1982 Upper Tar River Erosion Survey. U.S. SCS, Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar
  18. Task Committee on Causes and Effects of Schoaling. 1983 Shoaling processes in navigable waters. Jour. Waterway, Port, Coas., Ocean Eng. 109: 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trimble. S. W. 1974 Man-Induced Soil Erosion in the Southern Piedmont. Ankeny, IA: Soil Cons. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
  20. Trimble, S. W. 1975 Denundation studies: Can we assume stream steady state? Science 188:1207–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trimble, S. W. 1977 The fallacy of stream equilibrium in contemporary denundation studies. Amer. J. Sci. 277: 876–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trimble, S. W. 1983 A sediment budget for Coon Creek, the Driftless Area, Wisconsin, 1853–1977. Amer. J. Sci. 283: 454–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walling, D. E. 1983 The sediment delivery problem. J. Hydrol. 65: 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Humana Press Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan D. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Pamlico-Tar River FoundationWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations