Abstract
Intensive care units have become a routine part of modern American medicine during the past 3 decades. Presently, it is estimated there are more than 60,000 intensive care unit (ICU) beds in America, and these beds account for approximately 35 billion dollars in health care costs per year. Because of the widespread availability of mechanical ventilators, dialysis machines, and cardiovascular support technique extraordinary life support is commonplace. Furthermore, the lay public is quite aware of the struggle for life and death which takes places in intensive care units. Along with the development of life support techniques have come the perplexing ethical issues dealing with whether or not to withhold or withdraw life support. Many patient cases have been adjudicated in courts of law and thus there is now a significant body of law that deals with withholding and withdrawing life support. This chapter addresses the medicolegal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support. Initially, we review recent legal trends and precedents involving life support. Following this we suggest general and specific principles to promote effective decision making. Finally, we use these principles to examine four common clinical situations dealing with life support: initiating basic life support, initiating advanced life support, withdrawing advanced life support, and withdrawing basic life support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal.3d 229, 1872.
Bartling v. Superior Court, 163 Cal. App.3d 186, 195, 1984.
Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App.3d 1127, 1986.
E.g., In re Conroy, 464 A.2d 303 NJ Super. Ct., App. Div., 1983.
Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App.3d 1006, 1983.
In Re Quinlan, 70 NJ 10, 335 A.2d 647, 79 ALR3d 205, 1976.
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, 497 N.E.2d 626 Mass., 1986.
Living Will. New York, Society for the Right to Die, 1985.
Eisendrath SJ, Jonsen AR: The living will: Help or hindrance? J Am Med Assoc 1983;249:2054–2058.
Jonsen AR: Dying right in California: The natural death act. Clin. Res. 1978;26: 55–60.
Gilfix M, Raffin TA: Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. West J Med 1984;141:387–394.
E.G., Brody H: Ethical Decisions in Medicine. Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1976.
Fuchs VR: The rationing of health care. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1572–1573.
Gonda TA, Ruark JE: Dying Dignified: The Health Professional’s Guide to Care. Menlo Park, CA, Addison-Wesley, 1984.
Title 22, California Administrative Code.
Bedell SE, Delbanco TL, Cook EF, et al: Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med 1983;309:569–576.
Bedell SE, Pelle D, Maher PL, et al: Do not resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. J Am Med Assoc 1986;256:233–237.
Schuster DP, Marion JM: Precedents for meaningful recovery during treatment in a medical intensive care unit. Am J Med 1983;75:402–408.
Knaus WA, Drpaer EA, Wagner DP, et al: Prognosis in acute organ system failure. Ann Surg 1985;206:685–692.
References
Matter of Storar, 52 NY 2d 363; Matter of Eichner v. Dillon, 52 NY 2d 363, 1981.
Matter of Quinlan. 70 NJ 10 New Jersey, 1976.
Matter of Eichner, New York 52 NY 2d 363, 1981.
DeLio v. Westchester County Medical Center, 129 A.D.2d 13, New York, 1987.
DeLio v. Westchester County Medical Center, 134 Misc.2d 206, 1986.
Matter of Conroy, 98 NJ 321, New Jersey, 1985.
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, 398 Mass. 417.
Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App.3d 1127; Barber v. Superior Court, 146 Cal. App.3d 1006; Corbett v. D’Alessandro, 487 So.2d 368, Fla.
Matter of Storar, 52 NY 2d 363, New York, 1981.
Supt. of Belcher town State School v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728, 1977.
Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App.3d 1127 (28 year old woman); Matter of Jobes, 210 N.J. Super. 543 (30 year old woman); Severns v. Wilmington Medical Center, 425 A.2d 156 (55 year old woman); Matter of Quinlan, 71 N.J. (21 year old woman).
Foody v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, 40 Conn. Supp. 127; Matter of Spring, 380 Mass. 629; Supt. of Belcher town State School of Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728.
New York Times, p. 38, Dec. 13, 1987.
See dissent of Judge Jones, Matter of Storar, 52 N.Y.2d 363, 1981.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raffin, T.A., Dicker, H., Robertson, J.D. (1989). Withholding and Withdrawing Life Support. In: Vevaina, J.R., Bone, R.C., Kassoff, E. (eds) Legal Aspects of Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4534-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4534-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8867-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4534-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive