Molecular Weight Variation of EBNAs as a Means to Identify Different Epstein-Barr Virus Isolates (EBNotyping)
Part of the
Experimental Biology and Medicine
book series (EBAM, volume 20)
When twenty-nine wild type isolates of Ep-stein—Barr virus (EBV) were tested, as part of a double blind placebo trial of the effect of a-cyclovir on infectious mononucleosis (1), we noted that the molecular weight of EBNA 1 and EBNA 2 varied considerably between the isolates, as measured by immunoblotting (2). Each isolate had its own unique combination of molecular weights. Hennessy et al (3) had already demonstrated that the molecular weight variation of EBNA 1 could be ascribed to variation in length of the internal repeat, IR 3, DNA-sequence, resulting in variable length of the predominant glycine-alanine repeat of EBNA 1. With the more recent identification of the high molecular weight EBNA-proteins, coded from the Bam HI L- and E-fragments (EBNA 3,4 and 6) (4,5,6), the molecular weight variation of these five EBV-proteins together seems to provide a safe measure to identify individual virus isolates (table 1).
KeywordsLatent Membrane Protein Infectious Mononucleosis Cord Blood Cell Wild Type Isolate Seropositive Donor
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Ernberg, I., Andersson, J. J
, 2267–2272, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernberg, I.et al. Int
7, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy et al., Science
, 1396–98, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallin et al., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.
, 1499–1503, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy et al., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.
, 5693–5697, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricksten et al., Proc.Natl
, 959–999, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke et al.J.Virol.
, 3870–3878, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gratama, JW et al., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.
, 8693–8696, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbini, ML and Ernberg,I. J
, 64, 539–547, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laemmli, UK. Nature
, 680–685, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernberg et al., to be published.Google Scholar
Sculley, TB et al.J
, 2069–2078, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratama et al., to be published.Google Scholar
LiLung, M et al.J
, 3862–3866,1988.Google Scholar
Katz et al.J.Inf. Dis.,153
, 601–604, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Katz et al., J.Inf. Dis.,157
308, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raab-Traub, N et al.Cell, 47
883–889, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Brown et al.,J.Virol.,62
, 962–969, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Linnemann, CC, et al.Lancet
, 964–966, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© The Humana Press Inc. 1989