Skip to main content

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Model Identification in Well Test Interpretation

  • Chapter
Automated Pattern Analysis in Petroleum Exploration
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

Pressure transient testing is used to determine characteristic properties of an oil or gas reservoir by interpreting its dynamic behavior. This dynamic behavior is represented at a given well by two different quantities: pressure and flow rate. During a well test, a perturbation is imposed on the rate, and the resulting pressure variation is measured. Reservoir properties are then obtained from the interpretation of this variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albin, O., 1987, An artificial intelligence approach to well test interpretation: MS Report, Stanford Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allain, O., 1988, An artificial intelligence approach to model identification in well test interpretation: Engineer Report, Stanford Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, J., Horne, R.N., Greenstadt, J.L., and Lopez, L., 1988, Improved estimation algorithms for automated type curve analysis of well tests: Soc. Petr. Engr., Formation Evaluation, 186–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdet, D., Whittle, T.M., Douglas, A.A., and Pirard, Y.M., 1983, A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis: World Oil 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A., and Pirard, Y.M., 1984, Use of pressure derivative in well test interpretation: paper SPE 12777 presented at the 1984 California Regional meeting of the Soc. Petr. Engr., Long Beach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., and Van Golf-Racht, T.D., 1984, Pressure derivative approach to well test analysis: A high-permeability North Sea reservoir example: paper SPE 12959 presented at the 1984 European Conference of the Soc. Petr. Engr., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earlougher, R.C., 1977, Advances in well test analysis: Soc. Petr. Engr. Monograph, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M.R, and Nilsson, N.J., 1987, Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence: Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gringarten, A.C., 1982, Interpretation of well tests in fissured reservoirs and multilayered reservoirs with double porosity behavior. Theory and practice: paper SPE 10044 presented at the International Petroleum Exhibition and Technical Symposium of the Soc. Petr. Engr., Bejing, 18–26 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gringarten, A.C., 1987, Type curve analysis: What it can do and cannot do: J. Petr. Tech., 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J.E., 1957, Effect of the Gestalt revolution—The Cornell Symposium on Perception: Psychol. Rev. 64 (2), 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B.P.K., 1986, Robot Vision: McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houzé, O., Home, R.N., and Ramey, H.J., 1988, Infinite conductivity fracture in a reservoir with double porosity behavior: Soc. Petr. Engr. Formation Evaluation, 510–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, E., and Buffart, H., 1983, The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory: Internal report, Department of Experimental Psychology, Univ. of Nijmegen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D.G., 1983, Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEdwards, D.G., 1981, Multiwell variable rate well test analysis: Soc. Petr. Engr. J. 21, 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H.A., 1976, Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search: Commun Assoc. Computing Machinery 19 (3), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, L., and Woo, P.T., 1976, A new approach to parameter estimation in well testing: paper SPE 5741 presented at the Fourth Symposium on Reservoir Simulation of the Soc. Petr. Engr., Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proano, E.A., and Lilley, I.J., 1986, Derivative of pressure: Application to bounded reservoir interpretation: paper SPE 15861 presented at the European Conference of the Soc. Petr. Engr., London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, H.J., 1976, Practical use of modern well test analysis: paper SPE 5878, presented at the California Regional Meeting of the Soc. Petr. Engr., Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, H.J., 1982, Pressure transient testing: J. Petr. Tech., Trans. AIME 273, 1407–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, A.J., and Horne, R.N., 1983, Automated type curve matching in well test analysis using Laplace space determination of parameter gradients: paper SPE 12131 presented at the Soc. Petr. Engr. Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegemeier, G.L., and Matthews, C.S., 1958, A study of anomalous pressure build-up behaviors: Trans. AIME 213, 44–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startzman, R.A., and Kuo, T.-B., 1986, A ruled-based system for well log correlation: paper SPE 15295 presented at the Symposium on Petroleum Industry Application of Microcomputers of the Soc. Petr. Engr., Silver Creek, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, C.F., McEdwards, D.G., Narasimhan, T.N., and Witherspoon, P.A, 1977, Variable flow well test analysis by a computer assisted matching procedure: paper SPE 6547 presented at the 47th Soc. Petr. Engr. Annual California Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A.T., Gatens, J.M., III, and Lane, H.S., 1988, Model selection for well test and production data analysis: Soc. Petr. Engr. Formation Evaluation 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, A.P., and Tenenbaum, J.M., 1983, On the role of structures in vision: in Human and Machine Vision, Beck, J., Hope, B., and Rosenfeld, A. (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, pp. 481–543.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  • Brady, J.M., 1981, Computer Vision: North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clocksin, W.F., and Mellish, C.S., 1987, Programming in Prolog: Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D., 1982, Vision: Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P.H., 1977, Artificial Intelligence: Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allain, O., Horne, R.N. (1992). The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Model Identification in Well Test Interpretation. In: Palaz, I., Sengupta, S.K. (eds) Automated Pattern Analysis in Petroleum Exploration. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4388-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4388-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8751-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4388-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics