Abstract
Formal complaints against hospitals (in common with formal complaints in most areas) are typically made in letters, and the response to the complainant is typically a letter back. A complaint file, therefore, does not merely contain a record of the complaint: it contains the complaint itself. From the complainant’s perspective, the files contain the essence of the story. The process of complaining, from the complainant’s perspective, consists in that exchange of letters. The complainant’s letter is his or her complaint. The letter back to the complainant is, very often, all the complainant gets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antaki, C. (Ed.). (1988). Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. London: Sage.
Finkelman, D. & Goland, T. (1990). The Case of the Complaining Customer. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 9–25.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15. Lincolin, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Nader, L. (Ed.). (1980). No Access to Law. New York: Academic Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1992). Attributions and Apologies in Letters of Complaint to Hospitals and Letters of Response. In: Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L., Weber, A.L. (eds) Attributions, Accounts, and Close Relationships. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8750-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4386-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive