In 1919, the Director of Rothamsted Experimental Station, Sir John Russell, invited Ronald Aylmer Fisher, a young mathematician with interests in evolution and genetics, to join the small group of scientists at Rothamsted in order that [see Russell (1966, p. 327)] “after studying our records he should tell me whether they were suitable for proper statistical examination and might be expected to yield more information than we had extracted.” Fisher accepted the invitation and in a very short time Russell realized (loc. cit.) “that he was more than a man of great ability; he was in fact a genius who must be retained.” In the few years that followed, Fisher introduced the subdivision of sums of squares now known as an analysis of variance (anova) table (1923), derived the exact distribution of the (log of the) ratio of two independent chi-squared variates (1924), introduced the principles of blocking and randomization. as well as the randomized block, Latin square, and split-plot experiments, the latter with two anova tables (1925), promoted factorial experiments, and foreshadowed the notion of confounding (1926). Of course Fisher made many contributions to theoretical statistics over this same period [see Fisher (1922)], but the above relate directly to the design and analysis of field experiments, the topic of the paper that follows. It was an incredibly productive period for Fisher, with his ideas quickly transforming agricultural experimentation in Great Britain and more widely, and in major respects these ideas have remained the statistical basis of agricultural experimentation to this day.
- Rothamsted Experimental Station
- Field Experi
- Young Mathematician
- Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau
- Sugar Beet Variety
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Arnold. G.C. (1985). The Hudson-Gosset correspondence. The New Zealand Statistician. 20. 20–25.
Barbacki, S., and Fisher. R.A. (1936). A test of the supposed precision of systematic arrangements, Ann. Eugen., 7, 189–193.
Box. J. F. (1978). R.A. Fisher. The Life of a Scientist. Wiley. New York.
Cochran, W.G., (1976). Early development of techniques in comparative experimentation. in On the History of Statistics and Probability ( D.B Owen. ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 3–25.
Davis, A W., and Speed. T.P. (1988). An Edgeworth expansion for the distribution of the F-ratio under a randomization model for the randomized block design, in Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV, vol. 2. (S.S. Gupta, and J.O. Berger, eds.). Springer-Verlag. New York, pp. 119 –130.
Eden, T., and Yates, F. (1933). On the validity of Fisher’s i test when applied to an actual sample of non-normal data, J. Agric. Sci., 23. 6–17.
Fisher, R.A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh. 52,399–433. (reprinted with a commentary by P.A.P. Moran and C.A.B. Smith as Eugenics Laboratory Memoir XLI. Cambridge University Press, London. 1966 ).
Fisher, R.A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lon. Ser. A. 222. 309–368.
Fisher. R.A. (1923). Appendix to Gosset (1923).
Fisher, R.A. (1924). On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics, Proc. Internal. Congress. Math. Toronto, 2. 805–813.
Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh.
Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Fisher, R.A., and Mackenzie. W.A. (1923). Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato varieties, J. Agric. Sci., 13, 311–320.
Fisher, R.A., and Wishart. J. (1930). The arrangement of field experiments and the statistical reduction of the results. Imperial Bur. Soil Sci., Tech. Comm., 10. 23.
Gosset, W S. (“Student”) (1923). On testing varieties of cereals. Biometrika, 15, 271– 293.
Gosset, W S. (“Student”) (1931). Yield trials, in Baillièré’s Encyclopedia of Scientific Agriculture, London, [reprinted as paper 15 in Gosset (1942)].
Gosset. W.S. (“Student”) (1936a). Cooperation in large-scale experiments, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Suppl., 3. 115–122
Gosset. W.S. (“Student”) (1936b). The half-drill strip system, Agricultural experiments, letter to Nature, 138, 971.
Gosset. W.S. (“Student”) (1937–8). Comparison between balanced and random arrangements of field plots. Biometrika. 29, 191–208.
Gosset, W.S. (1942). “Student’s” Collected Papers (E.S. Pearson and J. Wishart. eds., with a foreword by L. McMullen). Biometrika Office, University College. London.
Gosset, W.S. (1970). Letters from W.S. Gosset to R A. Fisher ( 1915–1936 ) ( Summaries by R.A. Fisher with a foreword by L. McMullen ). Private circulation.
Goulden, C H. (1931). Modem methods of field experimentation. Scientif. Agri., 11, 681.
Gregory, F.G., Crowther. F. and Lambert, A.R. (1932). The interrelation of factors controlling the production of cotton under irrigation in the Sudan, J. Agric. Sci., 22, 617.
Haines. W.B. (1929). Block 6. Manuring experiment. RRI Experiment Station. First report, Quar. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya., 1. 241–244.
Haines. W.B. (1930a). Block 6. Manuring experiment, RRI Experiment Station. Sec¬ond report. Quar. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya., 2. 31–35.
Haines, W.B. (1930b). Manuring of Rubber—II. Technique of plot experimentation, Quar. J Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya., 2, 51–60.
Hall. A.D. (1925). The principles of agricultural experiments. J. Min. Agric. Great Britain, 32. 202–210.
Hall, P., and Selinger, B. (1986). Statistical significance: Balancing evidence against doubt. Austral. J. Statist., 28, 354–370.
Harrison, C J., Bose, S.S.. and Mahalanobis. P.C. (1935). The effect manurial dressing, weather conditions and manufacturing processes on the quality of tea at Tocklai experimental station, Assam. Sankhyā. 2. 33–42.
Hotelling. H. (1951). The impact of R.A. Fisher on statistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 46. 35–46.
Kempthorne. O. (1952). The Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley. New York.
Kerr. J.D. (1988). Introduction of statistical design and analysis by the Ouccnsland Board of Sugar Experiment Stations, Austral. J. Statist., 30B, 44–53.
Kirk. L.E. (1929). Field plot technique with potatoes with special reference to the Latin square, Scientif. Agri., 9. 719–729.
Mahalanobis. P.C. (1938). Professor Ronald Aylmer Fisher, Sankhyā, 4. 265–272.
Mead, R. (1988). The Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles for Practical Applications. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Mercer. W.B.. and Hall. A.D. (1911). The experimental error of field trials, J. Agric. Sci., 4, 107–132.
Neyman. J. (1967). R.A. Fisher (1890–1962): An appreciation. Sci., 156. 1456–1460.
Neyman, J. (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experi¬ments. Essay on principles. Statist. Sci. 5, 465–480. (translation from the original Polish. Rocz. Nauk. Roln X (1923) pp. 27–42 by D. Dabrowska. T.P. Speed, ed.).
Patterson, H.D.. and Silvey. V. (1980). Statutory and recommended list trials of crop varieties in the United Kingdom. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. A., 143. 219–252
Patterson. H.D.. Williams, E.R., and Hunter, E.A. (1978). Block designs for variety trials. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge. 90. 395–400.
Pearce, S.C. (1983). The Agricultural Field Experiment. A Statistical Examination of Theory and Practice. Wiley, New York.
Pitman. E.J.G. (1938). Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations: III. The analysis of variance tests, Biometrika, 29, 322–335.
Richey, F.D. (1930). Some applications of statistical methods to agronomic experiments, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 25. 269–283.
Russell. E.J. (1926). Field experiments: How they are made and what they are. J. Min. Agric. Great Britain. 32. 989–1001.
Russell, E.J. (1966). A History of Agricultural Science in Great Britain. George Allen & Unwin. London.
Savage, LJ. (1976). On rereading R.A. Fisher (J.W. Pratt, ed.). Ann. Statist., 4.441–500.
Seal, H. (1967). The historical development of the Gauss linear model, Biometrika, 54, 1–24.
Seeger, P., Kristensen, K., and Norell, L. (1987). Experimental designs in two dimensions for official sugar beet variety trials in Scandinavia. Report 286, Department of Economics and Statistics, Svcngcs Lantbruksuniversitet (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Uppsala.
Snedecor, G.W. (1934). Computation and Interpretation of Analysis of Variance and Covariance. Collegiate Press, Ames, Iowa.
Tippett, L.H.C. (1935). Some applications of statistical methods to the study of varia¬tion of quality in the production of cotton yarn, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Suppl., 2, 27–62.
Wald, A., and Wolfowitz J. (1944). Statistical tests based on permutations of the observations. Ann. Math. Statist., 15, 358–372.
Welch, B.L. (1937). On the r-test in randomized blocks and Latin squares, Biometrika, 29, 21–51.
Wilkinson, G.N., Eckhart, S.R., Hancock, T.W., and Mayo, O. (1983). Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments (with discussion), J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B. 45. 151–211.
Williams, E.R., and John. J.A. (1989). Construction of row and column designs with contiguous replicates, Appl. Statist., 38. 149–154.
Wishart, J. (1935). Contribution to the discussion of Tippett (1935). pp. 58–59.
Wood, T.B., and Stratton, FJ.M. (1910). The interpretation of experimental results, J. Agric. Sci.. 3. 417–440.
Yates, F. (1939). The comparative advantages of systematic and randomized arrange¬ments in the design of agricultural and biological experiments. Biometrika, 30, 440–466.
Yates, F. (1964). Sir Ronald Fisher and the design of experiments. Biometrics, 20, 307–321.
Yates, F. (1965-66). A fresh look at the basic principles of the design and analysis of experiments, in Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 4. Berkeley: University of California Press. (J. Neymanand E.L. Scott, eds.) pp. 777–790.
Yates. F. (1975). The early history of experimental design, in A Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models (J.N. Srivastava, ed.) North-Holland. Amsterdam: pp. 581–591
Yates, F.. and Mather. K.. (1965). Ronald Aylmer Fisher. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Roy. Soc., 9, 91–120.
Younden. W.J. (1951). The Fisherian revolution in methods of experimentation, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 45, 47–50.
Editors and Affiliations
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Speed, T.P. (1992). Introduction to Fisher (1926) The Arrangement of Field Experiments. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (eds) Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94039-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4380-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive