Projective Quadrics, Poles, Polars, and Legendre Transformations

  • Richard C. Pappas
Conference paper


In a study of the solution of certain differential equations, Legendre discovered a transformation with remarkable properties, which has since been found to have applications in analysis, mechanics, and thermodynamics. (See Courant & Hilbert (1962).) In classical mechanics, for example, the Legendre transformation (LT) is used to make the transition from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian formalism. In modern texts, this transition is usually given a differential geometric interpretation: Lagrangian mechanics takes place on the tangent bundle TM of the configuration space manifold M, Hamiltonian mechanics on the cotangent bundle T* M. However, there is another geometric context in which the LT may be viewed (regardless of the branch of physics in which it is applied): the LT is in fact a particular case of a construction in projective geometry. The symmetry, or “duality”, between the new and old variables in the transformation (reflected in the duality of TM and T* M in the differential geometric formalism) may be expressed as the projective duality between so-called “poles” and “polars” in the theory of projective quadrics.


Projective Space Symplectic Structure Clifford Algebra Projective Geometry Cotangent Bundle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    R. Abraham and J.E. Marsden, Foundations of Mechanics (Benjamin/Cummings, NY, 1978)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V.I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1978)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Baer, Linear Algebra and Projective Geometry (Academic Press, NY, 1952)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Busemann and P.J. Kelly, Projective Geometry and Projective Metrics (Academic Press, NY, 1953)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II (Interscience, NY, 1962)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Hestenes, “Hamiltonian Mechanics with Geometric Calculus”, in Z. Oziewicz, A. Borowicz, and B. Jancewicz (eds), Spinors, Twistors and Clifford Algebras (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, 1993)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Hestenes and G. Sobczyk, Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Hestenes and R. Ziegler, “Projective Geometry with Clifford Algebra,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 23, 25–63 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.C. Pappas, “A Formulation of Hamiltonian Mechanics using Geometric Calculus”, in F. Brackx, R. Delanghe, and H. Serras (eds), Clifford Algebras and their Applications in Mathematical Physics (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, 1993), pp. 251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R.C. Pappas, “Oriented Projective Geometry with Clifford Algebra” in “Clifford Algebras with Numeric and Symbolic Computations”, eds. R. Ablamowicz, P. Lounesto, and J. M. Parra, Birkhauser, Boston, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Pappas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsWidener UniversityChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations