Integration Methods for Molecular Dynamics
Classical molecular dynamics simulation of a macromolecule requires the use of an efficient time-stepping scheme that can faithfully approximate the dynamics over many thousands of timesteps. Because these problems are highly nonlinear, accurate approximation of a particular solution trajectory on meaningful time intervals is neither obtainable nor desired, but some restrictions, such as symplecticness, can be imposed on the discretization which tend to imply good long term behavior. The presence of a variety of types and strengths of interatom potentials in standard molecular models places severe restrictions on the timestep for numerical integration used in explicit integration schemes, so much recent research has concentrated on the search for alternatives that possess (1) proper dynamical properties, and (2) a relative insensitivity to the fastest components of the dynamics. We survey several recent approaches.
Key wordsleapfrog method Verlet method symplectic method multiple-timestep methods symplectic integrator molecular dynamics simulation constrained dynamics SHAKE multiple time scales long-time integration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allen, M.P. and Tildesley, D.J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford Science, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
- Barth, E., A user’s guide to MBLab, 1993 Matlab Conference Proceedings, electronic publication available via anonymous ftp from ftp.mathworks.com.
- Boothby, W.M., An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
- Brooks, B.R., Zhou, J., and Reich, S., Elastic molecular dynamics with flexible constraints, in preparation.Google Scholar
- Daubechies, I., Ten Lectures on Wavelets, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.Google Scholar
- Hairer, E., Norsett, S., and Wanner, G., Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, I, Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
- Hayli, A., Le problème des N corps dans un champ extérieur application a l’évolution dynamique des amas ouverts-I, Bulletin Astronomique 2, 67–89, 1967.Google Scholar
- Janezic, D. and Orel, B., Implicit Runge-Kutta methods for molecular dynamics integration, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 33, 252–257, 1993.Google Scholar
- Jay, L., Symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods for constrained Hamiltonian systems, PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Geneva, 1993.Google Scholar
- Marsden, J.R. and Ratiu, T., An Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
- McCammon, J.A. and Harvey, S.C., Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
- Ortega, J.M. and Rheinboldt, W.C., Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables, Academic Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
- Pathria, P.K., Statistical Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972.Google Scholar
- Reich, S., Molecular dynamics with soft constraints, Technical Report UIUC-BI-TB-94-12, Beckman Institute, Urbana, 1994.Google Scholar
- Sanders, J.A. and Verhulst, F., Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
- Sanz-Serna, J.M. and Calvo, M.P., Numerical Hamiltonian Problems, Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.Google Scholar
- Simo, J., Rarnow, N., and Wong, K.K., Exact energy-momentum conserving algorithms and symplectic schemes for nonlineaer dynamics, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1, 1528–1544, 1992.Google Scholar
- Skeel, R.D. and Biesiadecki, J.J., Symplectic integration with variable stepsize, Annals of Numer. Math. 1, 191–198, 1994.Google Scholar