Conscious or Nonconscious Feigning of Deficits
The issue of conscious (voluntary) or nonconscious (involuntary) exaggeration or feigning of cognitive deficits on neuropsychological testing has not received much formal attention in the literature, despite its importance for clinical practice. The credibility of neuropsychology within the legal arena hinges on the ability to accurately detect the presence of actual brain dysfunction. In addition, appropriate treatment is contingent on accurate discrimination of actual brain compromise versus functional disorder.
KeywordsFatigue Toxicity Depression Migraine Dementia
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.-Revised). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Bender, O. (1938). A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use. New York: The American Orthopsychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Benton, A., & Spreen, O. (1961). Visual memory test: The simulation of mental incompetence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 79–83.Google Scholar
- Lezak, M. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McMahon, E.A., & Satz, P. (1981). Clinical neuropsychology: Some forensic applications. In S. Filskov & R. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 686–701). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sevash, S., & Brooks, J. (1983). Aphasia versus functional disorder: Factors in differential diagnosis. Psychosomatics, 24, 847–848.Google Scholar