Advertisement

Traumatized Hosts: Their Influence on the Population Dynamics of the Southern Pine Bark Beetle Guild

  • Richard O. Flamm
  • Robert N. Coulson
Conference paper

Abstract

There is considerable interest worldwide in understanding the interactions between plants and insects. Typically, studies focus on the interactions of individual plants and insects and then extrapolate to the population level. This extrapolation may be misleading because studies at the level of the individual necessarily simplify and overlook many abiotic and biotic factors of the environment which affect population-level performance. Therefore, population-level predictions formed from studies at the individual level may differ substantially from actual observations made at the population level. In this chapter, we study host/insect interactions directly at the population level. We compare parameters of bark beetle population dynamics in traumatized trees (host defenses presumed to be largely removed) and in naturally infested pines (defenses presumed to be relatively intact) to examine the role of disturbed trees in the epidemiology of the southern pine bark beetle guild. Specifically, we consider (1) arrival densities, (2) attack densities, (3) colonization distributions, (4) emergence densities, (5) oviposition, (6) brood production, and (7) survivorship of bark beetles.

Keywords

Bark Beetle Arrival Density Emergence Density Lightning Strike Beetle Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amman, G. D. 1969. Mountain pine beetle emergence in relation to depth of lodgepole pine bark. USDA, Forest Service, Res. Note INT-96, 8 p.Google Scholar
  2. Amman, G. D. 1972. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 138–140.Google Scholar
  3. Berisford, C. W. 1981. Natural enemies and associated organisms. In: The southern pine beetle (R. L. Thatcher, J. L. Searcy, J. E. Coster, and G. D. Hertel, Eds.). USDA, Forest Service, Tech. Bull. 1631; 31–54.Google Scholar
  4. Berryman, A. A. 1976. Theoretical explanation of mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Environ. Entomol. 5: 1225–1233.Google Scholar
  5. Blanche, C. A., J. D. Hodges, and T. E. Nebeker. 1985. Changes in bark beetle susceptibility indicators in a lightning-struck loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanche, C. A., J. D. Hodges, T. E. Nebeker, and D. M. Moehring. 1983. Southern pine beetle: the host dimension. Mississippi Agricultural Forest Experiment Station Publ. 917, 29 p.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. A. and K. P. Davis. 1973. Forest fire: control and use. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Cates, R. G. and H. Alexander. 1982. Host resistance and susceptibility. In: Bark beetles in North American conifers ( J. B. Mitton and K. B. Sturgeon, Eds.). Austin, TX: Univ. Texas; 212–263.Google Scholar
  9. Coulson, R. N., R. O. Flamm, P. E. Pulley, T. L. Payne, E. J. Rykiel, and T. L. Wagner. 1986. Response of the southern pine bark beetle guild (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host disturbance. Environ. Entomol. 15: 850–858.Google Scholar
  10. Coulson, R. N., F. P. Hain, J. L. Foltz, and A. M. Mayyasi. 1975. Techniques for sampling the dynamics of southern pine beetle populations. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Misc. Publ. 1135, 19 p.Google Scholar
  11. Coulson, R. N., P. B. Hennier, R. O. Flamm, E. J. Rykiel, L. C. Hu, and T. L. Payne. 1983. The role of lightning in the epidemiology of the southern pine beetle. Z. Angew. Entomol. 96: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulson, R. N., A. M. Mayyasi, J. L. Foltz, F. P. Hain, and W. C. Martin. 1976. Resource utilization by the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 108: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulson, R. N., E. J. Rykiel, M. C. Saunders, T. L. Payne, R. O. Flamm, T. L. Wagner, and P. B. Hennier. 1985. A conceptual model of the role of lightning in the epidemiology of the southern pine beetle. In: The role of the host in the population dynamics of forest insects (L. Safranyik, Ed.)? Proceedings, IUFRO Conference; 1983 September 4–7; Banff, Alberta. Victoria, BC: Canadian Forestry Service and USDA, Forest Service; 136–146.Google Scholar
  14. Flamm, R. O., T. L. Wagner, S. P. Cook, P. E. Pulley, R. N. Coulson, and T. McArdle. (1987). Host colonization by cohabitingDendroctonus frontalis.Ips avulsus, andI.calliaraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 16: 390–399.Google Scholar
  15. Foltz, J. L., A. M. Mayyasi, F. P. Hain, R. N. Coulson, and W. C. Martin. 1976. Egg-gallery length relationship and within-tree analysis for the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 108: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haack, R. A., J. L. Foltz, and R. C. Wilkinson. 1984a. Longevity and fecundity ofIps avulsus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in relation to slash pine phloem thickness. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 657–662.Google Scholar
  17. Haack, R. A., R. C. Wilkinson, J. L. Foltz, and J. A. Corneil. 1984b. Gallery construction and oviposition byIps callicrraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in relation to slash pine phloem thickness and temperature. Can. Entomol. 116: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hetrick, L. A. 1949. Some overlooked relationships of southern pine beetle. J. Econ. Entomol. 42: 466–469.Google Scholar
  19. Hodges, J. D. and L. S. Pickard. 1971. Lightning in the ecology of the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 103: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Komarek, E. V. 1964. The natural history of lightning. Proceedings, Third Annual Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference; Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station; 139–186.Google Scholar
  21. Linit, M. J. and F. M. Stephen. 1983. Parasite and predator component of within-tree southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mortality. Can. Entomol. 115: 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorio, P. L. and W. H. Bennett. 1974. Recurring southern pine beetle infestations near Oakdale, La. USDA, Forest Service, Res. Pap. SO-95.Google Scholar
  23. McClelland, W. T., F. P. Hain, C. J. DeMars, W. S. Fargo, R. N. Coulson, and T. E. Nebeker. 1978. Sampling bark beetle emergence: a review of methodologies, a proposal for standardization and a new trap design. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24: 137–140.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, M. C. 1983. Lightning strike simulation for studying southern pine bark and engraver beetle attacks. USDA, Forest Service, Pap. SO-296.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, G. E. 1971. Mortality factors caused by pathogenic bacteria and fungi of the southern pine beetle in North Carolina. J. Invert. Path. 17: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulley, P. E., J. L. Foltz, A. M. Mayyasi, and R. N. Coulson. 1976. Topological mapping to estimate numbers of bark-inhabiting insects. Environ. Entomol. 5: 640–643.Google Scholar
  27. Pulley, P. E., R. N. Coulson, J. L. Foltz, W. C. Martin, and C. L. Kelly. 1977. Sampling intensity, informational content of samples, and precision in estimating within-tree population ofDendroctonus frontalis. Environ. Entomol. 6: 607–615.Google Scholar
  28. Rykiel, E. J. 1985. Towards a definition of ecological disturbance. Aus. J. Ecol. 10: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wagner, T. L., W. S. Fargo, R. O. Flamm., R. N. Coulson, and P. E. Pulley. 1987. Development and mortality ofIps callicrraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) at constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol. 16: 484–497.Google Scholar
  30. Wagner, T. L., P. B. Hennier, R. O. Flamm, and R. N. Coulson. (In press 1987). Development and mortality ofIpsavulsus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) at constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard O. Flamm
  • Robert N. Coulson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations