Paleokarst pp 306-328 | Cite as

Paleokarstic Features in Mississippian Limestones, New Mexico

  • William J. Meyers

Abstract

Paleokarst features in Mississippian limestones of southern New Mexico occur beneath the sub-Penn- sylvanian unconformity over an area greater than 20,000 km2. These paleokarst features pervade the upper few meters to few tens of meters of the crinoidal calcarenites of the Lake Valley and Kelley formations, and occur in a vertical profile that shows progressively more intense dissolution upward. This profile consists of, in ascending order: (1) etching of pre-Pennsylvanian freshwater phreatic syntaxial cements; (2) micrite and microspar plugging of in- tergranular pores, filling around crinoids, bryozoans, and pre-Pennsylvanian freshwater syntaxial cements; (3) clay and detrital quartz silt plugging intergranular pores and filling around etched crinoids and etched pre-Pennsylvanian freshwater syntaxial cements; (4) fragmented host limestone forming rubble-and-fis- sure fabrics composed of nodules of host rock that are surrounded by anastomosing veinlets and fissures filled with “weathering calcarenite,” clay, and detrital quartz silt; and (5) chert breccia composed of chert fragments derived from the underlying Lake Valley/ Kelley formations within a matrix of clay, quartz silt, and sand-sized chert fragments.

The paleokarst profile is interpreted as having developed mainly in the vadose zone on crinoidal limestones that were partly cemented but had high intergranular porosity and permeability. The chert breccias are interpreted as insoluble residues from intense weathering of Lake Valley/Kelley formations limestones plus extraformational clay and detrital quartz. The rubble-and-fissure fabrics resulted from dissolution fragmentation, and the intergranular clay and quartz comprise eluviated sediment carried downward by percolating vadose waters. The intergranular micrite and microspar are interpreted as a combination of neomorphic microspar and eluviated carbonate sediment. This eluviated sediment was possibly derived from chemical disintegration of host rock carbonate in the rubble-and-fissure zone and from remobilized primary depositional mud.

Karstification was most intense in the western and northwestern parts of the study area, a regional trend that correlates with intensity of other diagenetic features. These regional trends attest to a chemically more aggressive groundwater system in the west and northwest than in the east during pre-Pennsylvanian freshwater diagenesis and karstification. The restriction of much of the alteration in the Lake Valley/Kelley formations to intergranular pores and relatively small dissolution cavities within a relatively thin interval (meters to tens of meters), contrasts with the large bedding- and joint-controlled caves and passages extending over thick intervals (hundreds of meters or more) characteristic of conventional extant karst. This difference is due in part to the high intergranular permeabilities and porosities of the Lake Valley/Kelley formations crinoidal calcarenites during karstification. As such, the Lake Valley/Kelley formations may provide a model applicable to karstification of other carbonates during early stages of their diagenetic histories while they still have high intergranular permeabilities.

Keywords

Permeability Quartz Mold Sandstone Cretaceous 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandersson, T., 1972, Micritization of carbonate particles: processes of precipitation and dissolution in modern shallow-marine sediments: Bull. Geological Institutions Univ. Uppsala, New Series, v. 3, p. 201–236.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, A.K., 1962, Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Mississippian System in southwestern New Mexico and adjacent southeastern Arizona: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir 8, 79 p.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, R., 1964, Fabric and mineral analysis of soils: New York, John Wiley and Sons, 470 p.Google Scholar
  4. Chafetz, H.S., 1982, The Upper Cretaceous Bear- tooth Sandstone of southwestern New Mexico: a transgressive deltaic complex on silicified paleokarst: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 52, p. 157–169.Google Scholar
  5. Coniglio, M., and Harrison, R.S., 1983, Holocene and Pleistocene caliche from Big Pine Key, Florida: Bull. Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 31, p. 3–13.Google Scholar
  6. Dunham, R.J., 1969, Early vadose silt in Townsend mound (reef), New Mexico, in Friedman, G.M., ed., Depositional environments in carbonate rocks: Soc. Econ. Paleontologists Mineralogists Spec. Pub. No. 14, p. 139–181.Google Scholar
  7. Esteban, M., Klappa, C.F., 1983, Subaerial exposure environments, in Scholle, P.A., Bebout, D.G., Moore, C.H., eds., Carbonate depositional environments: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Memoir No. 33, p. 1–54.Google Scholar
  8. Ireland, P., 1979, Geomorphological variations of “case hardening” in Puerto Rico: Z. Geomorph. N.R., Suppl.—Bd., v. 32, p. 9–20.Google Scholar
  9. Jakucs, L., 1977, Morphogenetics of karst regions: New York, John Wiley and Sons, 284 p.Google Scholar
  10. James, N.P., 1972, Holocene and Pleistocene calcareous crust (caliche) profiles: criteria for subaerial exposure: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 42, p. 817–836.Google Scholar
  11. Jennings, J.N., 1971, Karst: Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 252 p.Google Scholar
  12. Kahle, C.F., 1977, Origin of subaerial Holocene calcareous crusts: role of algae, fungi and spar mi- critisation: Sedimentology, v. 24, p. 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kobluk, D.R., Pemberton, S.G., Karolyi, M., Risk, M.J., 1977, The Silurian—Devonian disconformity in southern Ontario: Bull. Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 25, p. 1157–1186.Google Scholar
  14. Lane, H.R., 1974, The Mississippian of southeastern New Mexico and West Texas—a wedge-on-wedge relation: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 58, p. 269–282.Google Scholar
  15. Lane, H.R., 1982, The distribution of Waulsortian facies in North America as exemplified in the Sac¬ramento Mountains of New Mexico, in Bolton, K., Lane, H.R., LeMone, D.V., eds., Symposium on the paleoenvironmental setting and distribution of the Waulsortian facies: El Paso, TX, El Paso Geo¬logical Society, p. 96–114.Google Scholar
  16. Laudon, L.R., Bowsher, A.L., 1941, Mississip¬pian formations of the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 25, p. 2107–2160.Google Scholar
  17. Laudon, L.R., Bowsher, A.L., 1949, Mississip¬pian formations of southwestern New Mexico: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 60, p. 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leutloff, A.H., Meyers, W.J., 1984, Regional distribution of microdolomite inclusions in Mis-sissippian echinoderms from southwestern New Mexico: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 432–446.Google Scholar
  19. Meyers, W.J., 1973, Chertification and carbonate cementation in the Mississippian Lake Valley Fm., Sacramento Mts., New Mexico: Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Rice University, Houston, 353 p.Google Scholar
  20. Meyers, W.J., 1974, Carbonate cement stratigraphy of the Lake Valley Formation (Mississippian), Sac¬ramento Mts., New Mexico: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 837–861.Google Scholar
  21. Meyers, W.J., 1977, Chertification in the Mississippian Lake Valley Formation, Sacramento Mts., New Mexico: Sedimentology, v. 24, p. 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyers, W.J., 1978, Carbonate cements: their regional distribution and interpretation in Mississippian limestones of southwestern New Mexico: Sedimentology, v. 25, p. 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyers, W.J., 1980, Compaction in Mississippian skeletal limestones southwestern New Mexico: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 50, p. 457–474.Google Scholar
  24. Meyers, W.J., Hill, B.E., 1983, Quantitative studies of compaction in Mississippian skeletal limestones, New Mexico: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 53, p. 231–242.Google Scholar
  25. Meyers, W.J., Lohmann, K.C., 1985, Isotope geochemistry of regionally extensive calcite cement zones and marine components in Mississippian limestones, New Mexico, in Schneidermann, N., Harris, P.M., Carbonate cements: Soc. Econ.Google Scholar
  26. Neugebauer, J., 1978, Micritization of crinoids by diagenetic dissolution: Sedimentology, v. 25, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pray, L.C., 1961, Geology of the Sacramento Mts. Escarpment: Bull. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 35, 144 p.Google Scholar
  28. Sando, W.J., 1974, Ancient solution phenomena in the Madison limestone (Mississippian) of north- central Wyoming: Jour. Research US Geol. Survey, v. 2, no. 2, p. 133–141.Google Scholar
  29. Sweeting, M.M., 1973, Karst landforms: London, MacMillan Publishing Co., 362 p.Google Scholar
  30. Walkden, G.M., 1974, Paleokarstic surfaces in the upper Visean (Carboniferous) limestones of the Derbyshire Block, England: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 1232–1247.Google Scholar
  31. Wright, V.P., 1982, The recognition and interpre-tation of paleokarsts: two examples from the Lower Carboniferous of south Wales: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 52, p. 83–94.Google Scholar
  32. Yurewicz, D.A., 1977, Basin-margin sedimentation, Rancheria Formation, Sacramento Mts., New Mexico, in Pray, L.C., ed., Guidebook to the Mis-sissippian shelf-edge and basin facies carbonates, Sacramento Mts. and Southern New Mexico Re-gion: Dallas Geological Society, p. 67–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. Meyers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations