A Comparison of the Performances of Procedures for Selecting the Normal Population Having the Largest Mean when the Variances are Known and Equal

  • Robert E. Bechhofer
  • David M. Goldsman

Abstract

We study the performance characteristics of procedures for selecting the normal population which has the largest mean when the variances are known and equal. The procedures studied are the single-stage procedure of Bechhofer, the closed two-stage procedure of Tamhane and Bechhofer, the open sequential procedure of Bechhofer, Kiefer, and Sobel and a truncated version of that procedure by Bechhofer and Goldsman, the closed multi-stage procedure with elimination of Paulson and improved closed versions of that procedure by Fabian and by Hartmann. The performance characteristics studied are the achieved probability of a correct selection, the expected number of stages required to terminate experimentation, and the expected total number of observations required to terminate experimentation. Except for the single-stage procedure, all performance characteristics are estimated by Monte Carlo sampling. Based on these results, recommendations are made concerning which procedure to use in different circumstances.

Keywords

Univer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechhofer, R.E. (1954). A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances. Ann. Math. Statist. 25, 16–39.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechhofer, R.E. and Goldsman, D.M. (1987). Truncation of the Bechhofer- Kiefer-Sobel sequential procedure for selecting the normal population which has the largest mean. Comm. Statist. — Simula. Computa. B16(4), 1067–1091.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechhofer, R.E. and Goldsman, D.M. (1989). Truncation of the Bechhofer- Kiefer-Sobel sequential procedure for selecting the normal population which has the largest mean (III): supplementary truncation numbers and resulting performance characteristics. Comm. Statist. —Simula. Computa. B 18(1), 63–81.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechhofer, R.E., Kiefer, J. and Sobel, M. (1968). Sequential Identification and Ranking Procedures (with special reference to Koopman-Darmois populations), Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bhandari, S.K. and Chaudhuri, A.R. (1987). On two conjectures about two-stage selection procedures. To appear in Sankhyā, Ser. B. Google Scholar
  6. Fabian, V. (1974). Note on Anderson’s sequential procedures with triangular boundary. Ann. Statist. 2, 170–176.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartmann, M. (1988). An improvement on Paulson’s sequential ranking procedure. Comm. Statist. — Sequential Analysis 7 (4), 363–372.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Miescke, K.-J. and Sehr, J. (1980). On a conjecture concerning the least favorable configuration of certain two-stage selection procedures. Comm. Statist. —Theor. Meth. A9, 1609–1617.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paulson, E. (1964). A sequential procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from k normal populations. Ann. Math. Statist. 35, 174–180.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sehr, J. (1988). On a conjecture concerning the least favorable configuration of a two-stage selection procedure. Comm. Statist. —Theor. Meth. A17 (10), 3221–3235.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tamhane, A.C. and Bechhofer, R.E. (1977). A two-stage minimax procedure with screening for selecting the largest normal mean. Comm. Statist. — Theor. Meth. A6, 1003–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamhane, A.C. and Bechhofer, R.E. (1979). A two-stage minimax procedure with screening for selecting the largest normal mean (II): a newPCS lower bound and associated tables. Comm. Statist. —Theor. Meth. A8, 337–358.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Bechhofer
    • 1
  • David M. Goldsman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Operations Research and Industrial EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.School of Industrial and Systems EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations