Advertisement

The Study of Affect and Mathematics: A Proposed Generic Model for Research

  • Elizabeth Fennema

Abstract

During the last 15 years, much understanding has been gained about cognitions in mathematics. Starting with the content area of early number concepts, progressing through rational numbers and algebra, and culminating with problem solving by university mathematicians, scholars have been probing cognitions and determining how human beings think with mathematical ideas. This knowledge is beginning to be useful not only in understanding human thought processes, but also in the development of new paradigms for curriculum development (Carpenter, in press). This knowledge has grown and become useful because a relatively consistent research methodology has been used in relation to a fairly concise theoretical model of cognitive processing. Usually this cognitive science research methodology started with an explicit definition of some specific mathematics content; questions relating to this definition have been formulated; subjects were asked to think aloud (or self-report) as they answered the questions; their responses were studied for patterns of thinking; and, finally, the identified patterns were compared with the overall theory to see if the theory was supported or needed modification.

Keywords

Mathematics Learning Mathematics Achievement Causal Attribution Attributional Style American Educational Research Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, T.P. (in press). Teaching as problem solving. In R.I. Charles & E.A. Silver, The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Crosswhite, F.J. (1972). Correlates of attitudes toward mathematics (National Longitudinal Study of Mathematical Abilities, Report No. 20). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dornbusch, S.M. (1974). To try or not to try. The Stanford Magazine, 2, 50–54.Google Scholar
  5. Dowling, D.M. (1978). The development of a mathematics confidence scale and its application in the study of confidence in women college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  6. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic choice: Origins and change. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Eccles, J.S. (1986, March). Gender roles and vocational decisions. The presidential address delivered to the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, J.C. (1987). Causal attribution, confidence, perceived usefulness, and mathematics achievement of nontraditional female and male college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  9. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P, & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers’ decision making and cognitively guided instruction: A new paradigm for curriculum development. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, London, England.Google Scholar
  10. Fennema, E., & Peterson, PL. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In L.C. Wilkinson & C.B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender-related differences in classroom interactions (pp. 17–35). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fennema, E., & Peterson, PL. (1986). Teacher-student interactions and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(1), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fennema E., & Peterson, PL. (1987). Effective teaching for girls and boys: The same or different? In D.C. Berliner & B.V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 111–125). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Fennema, E., Peterson, PL., & Carpenter, T.P. (1987). Teachers’beliefs about girls, boys and mathematics. Manuscript in progress.Google Scholar
  14. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fennema, E., Wolleat, P., Pedro, J., & Becker, A. (1981). Increasing women’s participation in mathematics: An intervention study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 72(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frieze, I.H., Fisher, J., Hansua, B., McHugh, M.C., & Valle, V.A. (1978). Attributions of the causes of success and failure as internal and external barriers to achievement in women. In J. Sherman & F. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology of women: Future directions of research (pp. 519–552). New York: Psychological Dimensions.Google Scholar
  18. Glennon, V.J., & Callahan, L.G. (1968). A guide to current research: Elementary school mathematics. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  19. Grieb, H., & Easley, J. (1984). A primary school impediment to mathematical equity: Case studies in role-dependent socialization. In M. Steinkamp & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Women in science: Vol. 2. Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 317–362). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gustin, W. (1982). Learning to become a mathematician: The development of independence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Helson, R. (1980). The creative woman mathematician. In L.H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique (pp. 23–54). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kloosterman, P.W. (1984). Attribution theory, learned helplessness, and achievement in ninth-grade mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  23. Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 2. Affective domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  24. Leder, G.C. (1987). Attitudes toward mathematics. In T.A. Romberg & D.M. Stewart (Eds.), The monitoring of school mathematics (pp. 261–277). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Google Scholar
  25. McCombs, B.L. (1986, April). The role of the self esteem in self-regulated learning. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, M.R. (1985). The prediction of mathematics achievement and participation for females and males: A longitudinal study of affective variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, M.R., & Fennema, E. (1988). Girls, boys, and mathematics. In T.R. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (pp. 406–425). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1988). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  29. Pederson, K., Elmore, P., & Bleyer, D. (1985). Affective and cognitive mathematics-related variables: A longitudinal study. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  30. Peterson, P.L., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 309–335.Google Scholar
  31. Sandman, R. (1973). The development, validation, and application of a multidimensional mathematics attitude instrument (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Dissertation Abstracts International, 34.Google Scholar
  32. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.Google Scholar
  33. Wolleat, PL., Pedro, J.D., Becker, A.D., & Fennema, E. (1980). Sex differences in high school students’ causal attributions of performance in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(5), 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Fennema

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations