Abstract
One of the problems for the field of semantic psychology and for any problem-solving effort is the “set” to employ methods and interpretations that have worked well in the past. In the field of problem solving the transfer of method or “set” to new problems was, long ago, shown to be efficient when it was appropriate but very costly when it was not (cf., e.g., Luchins, 1942). We believe that in extending the idea of inhibition to include their subject’s negative transfer in the word-naming task, Simpson and Kellas may be entering a blind alley. To be sure, the authors are aware of a problem for that interpretation, since inhibition generally declines with time; but they report, “We are conducting further research to examine whether there might have been some aspect of the present procedure that obscured an effect of lag.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gorfein, D.S., Walters, M.F. (1989). When Does “Soar” Become “Sore”? Some Comments on the Chapter of Simpson and Kellas. In: Gorfein, D.S. (eds) Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. Cognitive Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3596-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive