Abstract
Research on computer programs for understanding natural language can be both a consumer of psycholinguistic research on ambiguity and a contributor to such work. The fields have different ways of thinking, different concerns, and different criteria as to what counts as a result. I will show that, nevertheless, both fields may profit from cooperation, by giving examples from my own work and that of some of my students showing how issues raised or results obtained in one field can be of use in the other. The examples will include computer systems for lexical, structural, and thematic disambiguation that were inspired by recent psycholinguistic work. I will also show computational work on ambiguities of description attribution and other “large ambiguities” that raise, I will argue, interesting problems for psycholinguists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirst, G. (1989). Computational Models of Ambiguity Resolution. In: Gorfein, D.S. (eds) Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. Cognitive Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3596-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive