Advertisement

Overview of Injection Technology

  • Göran Carlsson
Part of the Materials Research and Engineering book series (MATERIALS)

Abstract

Treating steel in the ladle is as old as the use of ladles in steelmaking. The main purposes for ladle treatment of hot metal and liquid steel include desulphurization, deoxidation, alloying, and inclusion shape control. One of the first ordinary ladle metallurgical processes was the Perrin process [1], in which steel was tapped into a ladle containing premelted slag. The kinetic energy of the steel was used to produce a large reaction surface and intensive stirring in the ladle.

Keywords

Calcium Aluminate Powder Injection Slide Gate Ladle Treatment Injection Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Strauss, “The Perrin process,” Proc. 4th Electric Furance Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, December 5–7, pp. 236–240 (1946)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Bessemer, “An autobiography,” Offices of Engineering, London (1905)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Petersen et al., “Entschwefelung von Thomasroheisen,” Stahl und Eisen 60, 677–684 (1940)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.J. Koros et al., “The lime-mag process for desulphurization of hot metal,” Proc. SCANINJECT I, Luleå, Sweden, June 9–10, pp. D15:5–D15:13 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Carlsson, “Refining and alloying of steel by multi-component injection technique,” Proc. SCANINJECT III, Luleå, Sweden, June 15–17, pp. 22:5–22:20 (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Schnurrenberger et al., “Steel treatment in the ladle by injection through a slide gate nozzle,” Proc. SCANINJECT IV, Luleå, Sweden, June 15–13, pp. 30:5–30:22 (1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Taoka et al., “Development of hot metal desulphurization with limestone based flux,” Proc. 67th Steelmaking Conference, Chicago, April 5–4, pp. 335–339 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Carlsson et al., “Dephosphorization of hot metal with lime based fluxes—Experiments in 5 t scale,” Proc. Shenyang Symp. on Inj. Met. and Second Ref. of Steel, Shenyang, People’s Republic of China, September 19–21, pp. 467–483 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Anezaki et al., “Hot metal pre-treatment,” Trans. ISIJ 25, pp. 652–658 (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.E.K. Holappa, “Review of ladle metallurgy,” Proc. SCANINJECT II, Luleå, Sweden, June 12–13, pp. 1:5–1:24(1980)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Carlsson et al., “Entwicklung der Einblasmetallurgie in Skandinavien,” Verein Deutscher Eisenhüttenleute, Fachausschussberiecht 2.023, pp. 45–48 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Turunen, “Injection for treatment of steel in a ladle,” Jernkontorets Annaler 159, pp. 7–12 (in Swedish) (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Wada et al., “Investigation of desulphurization and deoxidation in injection metallurgy,” Proc. SCANINJECT II, Luleå, Sweden, June 12–13, pp. 21:5–21:15 (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Johansson, “Injection of powdered material in a 120 ton ladle in Smedjebacken,” Proc. SCANINJECT I, Luleå, Sweden, pp. 18:5–18:25 (1977)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. W. Helle et al., “Multi component injection—Development of the technology and results of trials at MEFOS,” Scand. J. Metallurgy 14, pp. 18–24 (1985)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Moriya et al., “Steel quality improvement by flux injection,” Proc. SCANINJECT III, Luleå, Sweden, June 15–17, pp. 32:5–32:34 (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Moriya et al., “Ladle treatment by injection,” Proc. SCANINJECT II, Luleå, Sweden, June 12–13, pp. 16:5–16:26(1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Devaux et al., “Control of non-metallic inclusions in steel by shallow silico-calcium injection in the ladle,” Proc. SCANINJECT II, Luleå, Sweden, June 12–13, pp. 31:5–31:33 (1980)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Folmo et al., “Desulphurization of steel in an acid ladle using CaSi and lime-fluorspar mixtures,” Proc. SCANINJECT II, Luleå, Sweden, June 12–13, pp. 15:5–15:18 (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Tivelius et al. “The influence of different desulphurizers on the process parameters and properties of solid material during TN ladle treatment,” Iron & Steelmaker, pp. 38–46 (November 1979)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Marique, “Industrial experience gained in Belgium with various calcium treatments of steel— Metallurgical and economical aspects,” Proc. ECE Seminar on the Economical Aspects of Secondary Steelmaking, Dresden, East Germany, June 15–19, paper No. R.5 (1987)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Nicholson et al., “Non-metallic inclusions and developments in secondary steelmaking,” Iron-making & Steelmaking 13, pp. 53–69 (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Väinölä et al., “Establishment of calcium treatment practices at Ovako—evaluation of alternative methods,” Proc. SCANINJECT IV, Luleå, Sweden, June 15–13, pp. 23:5–23:20 (1986)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.M. Henry et al., “Different types of calcium treatment as a contribution to the development of the continuous casting process,” Proc. SCANINJECT IV, Luleå, Sweden, June 15–13, pp. 24:5–24:18 (1986)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G.M. Faulring et al., “Steel flow through nozzles—influences of calcium,” Iron & Steelmaker, pp. 14–20 (February 1980)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    I.G. Davies et al., “Secondary steelmaking developments on engineering steels at Stockbridge works,” Proc. Conf. Secondary Steelmaking for Product Improvement, London, Great Britain, pp. 17:5–17:13(1984)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. Ollilainen, “The effect of Ca-treatment on the machinability of steel,” Proc. Swedish Symposium on Non-Metallic Inclusions in Steel, Södertälje, Sweden, pp. 429–450 (1981)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Carlsson, “The dephosphorization of stainless steel with CaC2—Experiments in 6 tonne ladle,” Proc. 4th Japan-Nordic Countries Joint Symposium on Science and Technology of Process Metallurgy, Tokyo, Japan, November 17–18, pp. 279–298 (1986)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    K. Kitamura et al., “Production of low phosphorous stainless steel by the reducing dephosphorization process,” Trans. ISIJ 24, pp. 635–638 (1984)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Yajima et al., “Improvements of plant economy by secondary steelmaking processes applied for speciality steels,” Proc. ECE Seminar on the Economic Aspects of Secondary Steelmaking, Dresden, East Germany, June 15–19, paper No. R. 7 (1987)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Tivelius et al. “Efficient injection metallurgy system—The importance of raw materials selection and equipment design,” information paperGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scandinavian Lancers AB, “Injection technology—from steel mill to steel foundry,” information paperGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Lehner et al., “Injection metallurgy for the refining of matte and blister copper,” Proc. 23rd Annual Conference of Metallurgists, Quebec, Canada, August 19–22, lecture No. 2 (1984)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Lundqvist, “Removal of alkali from blister copper,” Boliden Metall AB, Skelleftehamn, Sweden, Technical Report No. 6/55 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.E. Stolarczyk, “The removal of lead from copper in fire refining,” J. Inst. Met. 86, pp. 49–58 (1957–1958)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Bydalek, “Undersuchungen über die Raffination von Kupfer und Kupferlegierungen durch Kalziumkarbid,” Neue Hütte 22, pp. 663–665 (1977)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    L.W. Helle “Injection metallurgy—copper,” Jernkontoret report No. D323, (1980) (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Nakayama, IISI, information given at the ECE Seminar on the Economic Aspects of Secondary Steelmaking, Dresden, East Germany, June 15–19 (1987)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Gustafsson, Scandinavian Lancers International AB, private communicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Göran Carlsson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations