Skip to main content

Dyadic Models of Contraceptive Choice, 1957 and 1975

  • Chapter
Dyadic Decision Making

Abstract

Married couples are often theoretically and analytically treated as a single unit rather than as an interacting dyad. This is particularly common in studies of marital fertility, since births occur (at least socially) to couples. However, married couples do not always agree about whether and when to have children (Beckman, 1984; Czajka, 1979; Muhsam and Kiser, 1956; Westoff, Mishler, & Kelley, 1957; Westoff, Potter, Sagi, & Mishler, 1961), and there seem to be few real compromises between having and not having a(nother) child. They are therefore often faced with decisions about “joint” contraceptive behavior. Even though specific actions to prevent pregnancy may be undertaken by one or the other spouse, the other’s marital fertility is inhibited. If neither spouse contracepts, they share the risk of conception and birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (no. 45 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L. J. (1984). Husbands’ and wives’ relative influence on fertility decisions and outcomes. Population and Environment, 7, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L. J., Aizenberg, R., Forsythe, A. B., & Day, T. (1983). A theoretical analysis of antecedents of young couples’ fertility decisions. Demography, 20, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L. (1973). Is low fertility here to stay? Family Planning Perspectives, 5, 67–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, L. C., & Chang, M. (1981). Do husbands and wives agree? Fertility attitudes and later behavior. Population and Environment, 4, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czajka, J. L. (1979). Husband–wife agreement on desired family size in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. R., & Beach, L. R. (1981). Error patterns in the prediction of fertility behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, E. S., & Udry, J. R. (1979). Wives’ and husbands’ expected costs and benefits of childbearing as predictors of pregnancy. Social Biology, 26,265–21A.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. L. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W., Thornton, A., & Manis, J. D. (1978). The value of children to parents in the United States. Journal of Population, 7, 91–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-linear models. Sage University paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (no. 20 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhsam, H. V., & Kiser, C. V. (1956). The number of children desired at the time of marriage. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 34, 287–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A. G., & Groat, H. T. (1980). Fertility decision making, unintended births, and the social drift hypothesis: A longitudinal study. Population and Environment, 80, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social processes and power in families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 1. Research-Based Theories (pp. 295–316 ). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social processes and power in families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 1. Research-Based Theories (pp. 295–316 ). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townes, B. D., Beach, L. R., Campbell F. L., & Wood, R. L. (1980). Family building: A social psychological study of fertility decisions. Population and Environment, 3, 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 889–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. J., & Ryder, N. B. (1977). The contraceptive revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., Mishler, E., & Kelly E. (1957). Preferences in size of family and eventual fertility twenty years after. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., Potter, R. G., Jr., Sagi, P. C., & Mishler, E. G. (1961). Family growth in metropolitan America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomson, E. (1989). Dyadic Models of Contraceptive Choice, 1957 and 1975. In: Brinberg, D., Jaccard, J. (eds) Dyadic Decision Making. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3516-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3516-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8136-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3516-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics