Experiments on Electrodeposit Patterns

  • M. A. Guzman
  • R. D. Freimuth
  • P. U. Pendse
  • M. C. Veinott
  • L. Lam
Conference paper
Part of the Woodward Conference book series (WOODWARD)

Abstract

Experiments in electrochemical deposit patterns with a CuSO4 or ZnSO4 solution in a thin cell with parallel electrodes are presented. For CuSO4 the electrodes are copper strips and for ZnSO4 the electrodes are either copper or zinc strips. The control parameters are the solution concentration (C), the dc voltage across the electrodes (V), and the thickness of the cell (d). In our experiments, d varies from 0.1 to 0.7 mm, C varies from 0.025 to 1 M, and V reaches up to 30 V. For each run the voltage was held constant while the variation of the current with time and growth rate of the pattern was recorded. In addition to the well known patterns such as dendrites and strings, we find new patterns. Also, phase transitions may occur in which the filament thickness changes abruptly at some line parallel to the electrodes and this line is usually not at half of the separation between the two electrodes, in contrast to the case of radial cells. The forms of patterns depend very sensitively on the cell thickness. We conclude that processes underlying this type of pattern formation experiments cannot be considered strictly two dimensional.

Keywords

Zinc lOst ZnSO4 Copper Sulphate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Random fluctuations and Pattern Growth, edited by H.E. Stanley and N. Ostrowsky (Kiumer, Boston, 1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.M. Sander, in The Physics of Structure Formation, edited by W. Göttinger and G. Dangelmayr (Springer, New York, 1987 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Lam, R.D. Pochy and V.M. Castillo, in Nonlinear- Structures in Ehysical Systems, edited by L. Lam and H.C. Morris (Springer, New York, 1990 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Matsushita, M. Sano Y. Hayakawa, H. Honjo and Y. Sawada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 286 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Sawada, A. Dougherty and J.P. Gollub, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1260 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Grier, E. Ben-Jacob, R. Clarke and L.M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1264 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.H. Kaufman, C.K. Baker, A.I. Nazzal, M. Flickner and O.R. Melroy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1932 (1986); J.H. Kaufman, A.I. Nazzal, O.R. Melroy and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. B 35, 1881 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.C. Chan, V.M. Castillo, Y.J. Chang, K.L. Clague, M. Condron, J.K. Kim, H.S. Lakkaraju, L. Lam, W. Miner and R.D. Pochy, Paper presented at the Conference on Nonlinear Science, Santa Cruz, March 25–26, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.K. Kim, Y. Chang, R.D. Pochy, H.S. Lakkaraju and L. Lam, Paper presented at the Fourth Annual University of California Summer School on Nonlinear Science, Los Angeles, August 1–12, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Matsushita, Y. Hayakawa, and Y. Sawada, Phys. Rev. A 32, 3814 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Argoul, A. Arnedo, G. Grasseau and H.L. Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett 61, 2558 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Lam, in Wave Phenomena, edited by L. Lam and H.C. Morris (Springer, New York, 1989 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Guzman
    • 1
  • R. D. Freimuth
    • 1
  • P. U. Pendse
    • 1
  • M. C. Veinott
    • 1
  • L. Lam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations