Boundary Layer Receptivity to Unsteady Free-Stream Pressure Gradients

  • Roland A. E. Heinrich
  • Thomas B. Gatski
  • Edward J. Kerschen
Conference paper
Part of the ICASE/NASA LaRC Series book series (ICASE/NASA)


It has been speculated that boundary layer receptivity to free-stream disturbance fields can be the result of distributed mechanisms. These distributed mechanisms cause the receptivity to take place over streamwise distances of several Tollmien-Schlichting wavelengths, due to the interaction of the streamwise modulation of the free-stream disturbance and the otherwise parallel boundary layer flow. This is distinct to the usual localized receptivity mechanism which result from the interaction of the long wave-length free-stream disturbance with a short scale (local) surface irregular. Linear triple-deck theory is used to model the recent experiments of Nishioka and Morkovin (1986) and Kendall (1987) which are often viewed as supporting the distributed receptivity concepts. These experiments are modeled by introducing unsteady sources into the upper deck of the triple-deck structure to appropriately account for the effects of the unsteady pressure gradients in the free-stream. It is shown that this analysis reproduces the essential features of the experimental results. The structure of the solution suggests that distributed mechanisms can only cause exponentially small receptivity levels.


Boundary Layer Fourier Space Pressure Source Streamwise Distance Lower Deck 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Goldstein, M. E., 1983, “The evolution of Tollmien-Schlichting waves near a leading edge,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 127, pp. 59 – 81.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein, M. E., 1985, “Scattering of acoustic waves into Tollmien- Schlichting waves by small streamwise variations in surface geometry,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 154, pp. 509 – 529.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldstein, M. E., 1987, “Generation of Tollmien-Schlichting waves on interactive marginally separated flows,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 181, pp. 485 – 518.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldstein, M. E. and Hultgren, L. S., 1989, “Boundary-layer recep¬tivity to long-wave free-stream disturbances,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. Vol. 21, pp. 137 – 166.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinrich, R. A. E., Choudhari, M. and Kerschen, E. J., 1988, “A comparison of boundary layer receptivity mechanisms,” AIAA-3758, presented at the 1st National Fluid Dynamics Congress, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  6. Kendall, J. M., 1987, “Experimental study of laminar boundary layer receptivity to a travelling pressure field,” AIAA-87–1257, presented at the 19th Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 8 – 10.Google Scholar
  7. Kerschen, E. J., 1989, “Boundary-layer receptivity,” AIAA-89–1109, presented at the 12th Aeroacoustics Conference, San Antonio, Texas, April 10 – 12Google Scholar
  8. Morkovin, M. V., “Critical evaluation of transition from laminar to turbulent shear layers with emphasis on hypersonically traveling bodies,” AFFDL-TR-68-149.Google Scholar
  9. Nishioka, M. and Morkovin, M.V., 1986. “Boundary-layer receptivity to unsteady pressure gradients: experiments and overview,” J.Fluid Mech., Vol. 171, pp. 219–261.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reshotko, E., 1976 “Boundary layer stability and transition,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 8, pp. 311–349ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reshotko, E., 1984. “Environment and receptivity,” in AGARD Report 709, Special Course on Stability and Transition of Laminar Flow.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, F. T., 1979. “On the non-parallel flow stability of the Blasius boundary layer,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, Vol 366, pp.91–109.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland A. E. Heinrich
    • 1
  • Thomas B. Gatski
    • 2
  • Edward J. Kerschen
    • 3
  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA
  3. 3.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations