Abstract
The previous chapter showed that humanistic psychology, psychotherapy, and cognitive psychology have not posed unfair obstacles to the development of TEAB. That Skinner chose to look to these “obstacles” for answers to the question of why TEAB has not become psychology seems attributable to two incorrect assumptions that he made regarding the nature and status of contemporary psychology. These assumptions are that (a) contemporary psychology is not the science of behavior and (b) psychology is not regarded as a member of the scientific community. In the present chapter, we present evidence inconsistent with Skinner’s assumptions and then propose an alternative hypothesis for why TEAB has not become psychology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Proctor, R.W., Weeks, D.J. (1990). Contemporary Scientific Psychology. In: The Goal of B.F. Skinner and Behavior Analysis. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3394-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3394-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97236-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3394-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive