Skip to main content

Abstract

It is difficult to perform a small bowel meal study after a double-contrast examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract (see follow-through study). This study is therefore performed as a specific small bowel examination. With meticulous supervision, fluoroscopy, and palpation, this study is as sensitive as the small bowel enema for most common diseases [1]. The advantages of the small bowel meal over small bowel enema are patient tolerance, less fluoroscopic time because there is no need for tube placement, and ease of performance of the test [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ott DJ, Chen YM, Gelfand DW, Van Swearingen F, Munitz HA (1985). Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs enteroclysis. Part I. Expenditures and radiation exposure. Part II. Radiographic accuracy. Radiology 155:29–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maglinte DDT, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM (1987). Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 163:297–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garvey CJ, DeLacey G, Wilkins RA (1985). Preliminary colon cleansing for small-bowel examinations: results and implications of a prospective survey. Clin Radiol 36:503–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weltz GA (1937). Der kranke Duenndarm im Roentgenbild. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed Erganzungsband 55:20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gershon-Cohen J, Shay H, Fels SS (1940). The relation of meal temperature to gastric motility and secretion. AJR 43:237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brun B, Hegedus V (1980). Radiography of the small intestine with large amounts of cold contrast medium. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 21:(Stockh) 65–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kressel HY, Evers KA, Glick SN, Laufer I, Herlinger H (1982). The peroral pneumocolon examination: technique and indications. Radiology 144:414–416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher JK (1982). Angled view of the distal small bowel. Radiology 144:417–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fräser GM, Preston PG (1983). The small bowel barium follow-through enhanced with an oral effervescent agent. Clin Radiol 34:673–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schatzki R (1943). Small intestinal enema. AJR 50:743–751.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oudkirk M (1981). Infusion rate in enteroclysis examination. Thesis. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maglinte DDT, Miller RE (1984). A comparison of pumps used for enteroclysis. Radiology 152:815.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sellink JL, Miller RE (1982). Radiology of the Small Bowel. Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekberg O (1977). Double contrast examination of the small bowel. Gastrointest Radiol 1:349–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sellink JL (1976). Radiological Atlas of Common Diseases of the Small Bowel. Leiden: H.E. Stenfort.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Personal communication, Dr. C. Lu, University of Iowa Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kellett MJ, Zboralske FF, Margulis A (1977). Per oral pneumocolon examination of the ileocecal region. Gastrointest Radiol 1:361–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolf K-J, Goldberg HI, Wall SD, Rieth T, Walter EA (1985) Feasibility of the peroral pneumocolon in evaluating the ileocecal region. AJR 145:1019–1024.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzgerald EJ, Thompson GT, Somers S, Franic SF (1985). Pneumocolon as an aid to small-bowel studies. Clin Radiol 36:633–637.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maglinte DDT, Burney BT, Miller RE (1982). Lesions missed on small bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations. Radiology 144: 737–739.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller RE (1965). Complete reflux examination of the small bowel. Radiology 84:457–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Monsein LH, Haiport RD, Harris ED, Feczko PJ (1986). Retrograde ileography: value of glucagon. Radiology 161:558–559.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zagoria RJ, Gelfand DW, Ott DJ (1986). Retrograde examination of the small bowel in patients with an ileostomy. Gastrointest Radiol 11:97–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobranowski, J., Stringer, D.A., Somers, S., Stevenson, G.W. (1990). Small Bowel. In: Procedures in Gastrointestinal Radiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3308-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3308-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7961-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3308-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics