Abstract
How effective is clinical preventive medicine? Do screening tests result in more good than harm? Should a vaccine be administered routinely? Is counseling to change modifiable risk factors worth the effort? The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination and the US Preventive Services Task Force have attempted to answer these and similar questions by reviewing the quality of the evidence that such maneuvers are effective. Both groups recognized that the performance characteristics of preventive services must be evaluated systematically and impartially if sound clinical practice recommendations are to emerge from the process. Both groups, in developing a methodology and putting it into practice, have developed a better understanding of the analytic principles of assessing clinical efficacy and effectiveness. Although a complete discussion of these concepts is clearly beyond the scope of this book, certain observations regarding the analytic process of evaluating preventive services are relevant to the chapters that follow.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
For readers not steeped in the discipline of epidemiology, it can be easy, in all innocence, to overlook factors that may tip the balance of the benefit:harm ratio in either direction. Critical assessment of any screening procedure or preventive maneuver requires scrupulous accounting of all the variables. Dr Woolf’s discussion helps us ask the right questions and identifies the “fudge factors” that may mislead the unwary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 129 – 35.
Owen R. Reader bias. JAMA 1982; 247: 2533 – 34.
Chodak GW, Keller P, Schoenberg H. Routine screening for prostate cancer using the digital rectal examination. Prog Clin Biol Res 1988; 269: 87 – 98.
American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 1989. CA 1989; 39: 3 – 20.
Nelson RL, Abcarian H, Prasad ML. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25: 305 – 8.
Campbell TL. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening: benefits, risks, and costs. J Fam Pract 1987;25:5:461–67.
Cummings SR, Black D: Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis? Ann Intern Med 1986; 104: 817 – 23.
Anderson GM, Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate: Ontario data, 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 887 – 92.
Winslow CM, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, et al. The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 721 – 7.
Lefebvre RC, Hursey KG, Carleton RA. Labeling of participants in high blood pressure screening programs: implications for blood cholesterol screenings. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 1993 – 97.
Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Department of Health and Human Services, 1989. (Publication no. DHHS (PHS) 89–8411.)
Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1985.
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical epidemiology: the essentials. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1988.
Bailar JC III, Mosteller F, eds. Medical uses of statistics. Waltham, MA: NEJM Books, 1986.
Thacker SB. Meta-analysis: a quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA 1988; 259: 1685 – 89.
Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B, et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized controlled trial. Controlled Clin Trials 1981; 2: 31 – 49.
Eddy DM, Billings J. The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care. Health Affairs 1988; 7: 19 – 32.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolf, S.H. (1990). Analytic Principles in Assessing the Effectiveness of Clinical Preventive Services. In: Goldbloom, R.B., Lawrence, R.S. (eds) Preventing Disease. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3280-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3280-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7948-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3280-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive