Advertisement

The Cognitive Representation and Processing of Discourse: Function and Dysfunction

  • Carl H. Frederiksen
  • Robert J. Bracewell
  • Alain Breuleux
  • André Renaud
Part of the Springer Series in Neuropsychology book series (SSNEUROPSYCHOL)

Abstract

Natural language discourse, when viewed from a cognitive and psychological perspective, is a manifestation in extended natural language productions of conceptual representations and thought processes. A discourse reflects knowledge (of the writer or speaker as well as the reader or listener), purpose in communicating meaning through language, and the cognitive processes required to produce and comprehend knowledge and represent it as discourse. Thus, to a cognitive psychologist, discourse is viewed in terms of the knowledge and processes that generated it and that are required to understand it.

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Semantic Representation Semantic Network Semantic Structure Expert Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1984). Reading strategies for children and adults: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bracewell, R.J. (1986). Signalling semantic representation: The role of topical patterning in text. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual International Conference on the Teaching of English, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  3. Bracewell, R.J. (1987). Semantic and textual constraints students use in revising their writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Bracewell, R.J., Frederiksen, C.H., & Frederiksen, J.D. (1982). Cognitive processes in composing and comprehending discourse. Educational Psychologist, 17(3), 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breuleux, A. (1988a). L’élaboration et l’exécution de plans dans une tâche de rédaction. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  6. Breuleux, A. (1988b). The analysis of writer’s think aloud protocols: Developing a principled coding scheme for ill-structured tasks. In G. Denhière & J.-P. Rossi (Eds.), Texts and text processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A.L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–21.Google Scholar
  9. Butterworth, B. (1980). Evidence from pauses in speech. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carver, R.P. (1970). Effect of a “chunked” typography on reading rate and comprehension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coke, E.U. (1974). The effects of readability on oral and silent reading rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 406–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Larkin, K.M. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Danks, J.H. (1986). Identifying component processes in text comprehension: Comment on Haberlandt and Graesser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeRemer, M., & Bracewell, R.J. (1989). Students’ use of semantic structure in revising their writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Donin, J., Bracewell, R.J., Frederiksen, C.H., & Dillinger, M. (1989). Students’strategies for writing instructions: Organizing semantic information in text. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  16. Frederiksen, C.H., Bracewell, R.J., & Donin-Frederiksen, J. (1984). Toward a psychology of rhetoric. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  17. Emond, B. (1989). Charles S. Peirce system of existential graphs and automated reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  18. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ermann, L.D. (1977). A functional description of the Hearsay II speech understanding system. Proceedings of IEEE-ICASSP, Hartford, Conn., pp. 799–802.Google Scholar
  20. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flower, L., & Hayes, J.R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C.H. Frederiksen & J.F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: Process, development, and communication, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, N.J.: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  22. Frederiksen, C.H. (1975). Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 371–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frederiksen, C.H. (1986). Cognitive models and discourse analysis. In C.R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Written communication annual: An international survey of research and theory, Vol. 1: Studying writing: Linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Frederiksen, C.H. (1989a). Text comprehension in functional task domains. In D. Bloom (Ed.), Learning to use literacy in educational settings. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  25. Frederiksen, C.H., & Breuleux, A. (in press). Monitoring cognitive processing in seman-tically complex domains. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Frederiksen, C.H., Décary, M., & Hoover, M.L. (1988). The semantic representation and processing of natural language discourse: Development of a computational model. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on “Informatique et langue naturelle” Nantes, France.Google Scholar
  27. Frederiksen, C.H., & Dominic, J.F. (1981). Introduction: Perspectives on the activity of writing. In C.H. Frederiksen & J.F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Frederiksen, C.H., Donin-Frederiksen, J., & Bracewell, R.J. (1986). Discourse analysis of children’s text production. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  29. Frederiksen, C.H., & Renaud, A.(1987). On-line processing of text propositions: Linking reading time, on-line interpretation and recall. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association and the British Psychological Society, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  30. Gidk, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graesser, A.C., & Black, J.B. (Eds.). (1985). The psychology of questions. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Graesser, A.C., Hoffman, N.L., & Clark, L.F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greeno, J.G. (1978). Nature of problem-solving abilities. In W.K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Vol. 5: Human information processing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Grimes, J. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  35. Grosz, B.J. (1980). Utterance and objective: Issues in natural language communication. AI Magazine, 1, 11–20.Google Scholar
  36. Haberlandt, K.F., & Graesser, A.C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Hayes-Roth, B., & Thorndyke, B.W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hogoboam, T.W., & McConkie, G.W. (1981). The rocky road from eye fixations to comprehension. Technical Report No. 207, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  40. Hunt, K.W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35.Google Scholar
  41. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (1986). Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers. Brain & Language, 29, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J.M. (1973). Reading rate as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kubes, M. (1988). The use of prior knowledge in integration of information from technical materials. McGill University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  44. Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (Research Report No. 18). Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  45. Mann, W.C. (1983). An overview of the Penman text generation system, Information Sciences Institute Report 83-114. Los Angeles, Calif.: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  46. Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the teaching of English, 15, 113–134.Google Scholar
  47. McConkie, G.W., Hogoboam, T.W., Wolverton, G.S., Zola, D., & Lucas, P.A. (1979). Toward the use of eye movements in the study of language processing. Technical Report No. 134, University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar
  48. McKeown, K.R. (1985). Text generation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mel’cuk, I.A. (1979). Studies in dependency syntax. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Mitchell, D.C. (1984). An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating immediate processes in reading. In D.E. Kieras & M.A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, J.L., & Sellner, M.B. (1980). Discourse and linguistic theory. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, and W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Morrow, D.G. (1986). Grammatical morphemes and conceptual structure in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Newman, D., & Bruce, B.C. (1986). Interpretation and manipulation of human plans. Discourse Processes, 9, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olson, G.M., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R.L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D.E. Kieras and M.A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Pourafzal, F.K. (1984). Comprehension and question answering: A comparative study. Unpublished master’s thesis, McGill University, Montréal.Google Scholar
  57. Rayner, K. (1977). Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Memory and Cognition, 4, 443–448.Google Scholar
  58. Rayner, K., & Carroll, P.J. (1984). Eye movements and reading comprehension. In D.E. Kieras & M.A. Just (Eds.) New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Renaud, A. & Frederiksen, C.H. (1988). On-line processing of a procedural text. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Montréal.Google Scholar
  60. Ritchie, G. (1983). Semantics in parsing. In M. King (Ed.) Parsing natural language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Sanford, D.L., & Roach, J.W. (1987). Parsing and generating the pragmatics of natural language utterances using metacommunication. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Seattle.Google Scholar
  63. Schank, R.C. (1975). Conceptual information processing. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  64. Seidenberg, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1986). Modularity and lexical access. In I. Gopnik (Ed.) McGill studies in cognitive science. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  65. Sowa, J.F. (1984). Conceptual structures: Information processes in mind and machine. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  66. Stein, N., & Policastro, M. (1984). The concept of a story: A comparison between children’s and teachers’ viewpoints. In H. Mandl, N.L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Townsend, D.J. (1983). Thematic processing in sentences and texts. Cognition, 13, 223–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trabasso, T., and Nichols, D.W. (1980). Memory and inferences in comprehending narratives. In J. Becker and F. Wilkins (Eds.), Information integration by children. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  69. Tyler, L.K. (1983). The development of discourse mapping processes: The on-line interpretation of anaphoric expressions. Cognition, 13(3), 309–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  71. Voss, J.F., Vesonder, G.T., & Spilich, G.J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wisher, R.A. (1976). The effects of syntactic expectation during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Witte, S.P. (1983). Topical structure and recision: An exploratory study. College Composition and Communication, 34, 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Witte, S.P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zadeh, L.A. (1974). Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Processing, 74, 591–594.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl H. Frederiksen
  • Robert J. Bracewell
  • Alain Breuleux
  • André Renaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations