The Dynamics of Dioxygen Binding to Hemerythrin

  • Daniel Lavalette
  • Catherine Tetreau
Conference paper


Oxygen carrier heme-proteins have proven to be very convenient tools for investigating internal protein dynamics. When a short pulse of laser light is absorbed by an oxy-protein, the heme-02 bond is immediately disrupted. Since oxy- and deoxy-proteins display different absorption spectra, an optical signal is available for monitoring the sequence of events accompanying the return to the bound state. Because the energetics of rebinding are sensitive to the protein conformation, the reaction constitutes an internal time probe which is modulated by protein movements. Heme-proteins (e.g., Mb or Hbs) have long been investigated in many laboratories. H. Frauenfelder and his co-workers pioneered the field of photolysis in glassy solvents at low temperatures; in other words, at practically infinite viscosity. They showed that proteins exist in a large number of conformational substates with slightly different reaction rates and that O2 binding is governed by several energy barriers in sequence rather than just one. It was later recognized that some of the barriers and associated rate constants were also dependent upon viscosity in agreement with their assumed dynamic nature (1,2).


Reaction Coordinate Oxygen Carrier Transition State Theory Viscosity Dependence Geminate Recombination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Austin, R.H., Beeson, K.W., Eisenstein, L., Frauenfelder, H. and Gunsalus, I.C. (1975) Biochemistry 14: 5355–5373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beece, D., Eisenstein, L., Frauenfelder, H., Good, D., Marden, M.C, Reinisch, L., Reynolds, A.H., Sorensen, L.B. and Yue, K.T. (1980) Biochemistry 19: 5147–5157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurtz, D.M. (1986) In Invertebrate Oxygen Carriers, ed. B. Linzen, 25–36. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alberding, N., Lavalette, D. and Austin, R.H. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78: 2307–2309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lavalette, D. and Tetreau, C. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 145: 555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stenkamp, R.E., Sieker, L.C., Jensen, L.H., McCallum, J.D. and Sander-Loehr, J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA 82: 713–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kramers, HA. (1940) Physica 7:284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lavalette, D., Tetreau, C., Brochon, J.C. and Livesey, A.K. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. Submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Lavalette
    • 1
  • Catherine Tetreau
    • 1
  1. 1.Curie InstituteINSERM Unit 219, University of Paris SouthOrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations