Skip to main content

Comparing Apples with Oranges: Methods of Interecosystem Comparison

  • Chapter
Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems

Abstract

A review of the recent literature indicates that 16%–25% of current ecological research is based on interecosystem comparisons. These comparisons are made using three general approaches: Composite ecosystem comparisons strive to measure aggregate similarity of ecosystems; variable-focused comparisons strive to find how a few important characteristics vary among ecosystems; connection-focused comparisons concentrate on causal relationships and how mechanical function varies among ecosystems. Although ecologists make all the usual types of statistical errors, this review concentrates on five that are particularly common in comparative ecosystem analysis: (1) Results are biased by the choice of measured variables; (2) too many variables are measured, on (3) too few ecosystems; (4) interpretations are frequently based on probable coincidences; and (5) interecosystem comparisons are often informal. The consequences of these problems and remedial measures are discussed using visual and mathematical illustrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banse, K. and S. Mosher. (1980). Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations. Ecol. Monogr. 50:355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., W.G. Hunter, and J.S. Hunter. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters. Wiley, New York, 653 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, D. (1971). Lectures on Biostatistics—An Introduction to Statistics with Applications in Biology and Medicine. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. (1983). On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122:661–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W.J. (1971). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.W. (1968). The significance level in multiple tests made simultaneously. Heredity 23:614–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crome, F.H.J. and G.C. Richards. (1988). Bats and gaps: microchiropteran community structure in a Queensland rain forest. Ecology 69:1960–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, D. and V. Paquin. (1987). Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature (London) 329:326–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J. (1981). Population density and body size in mammals. Nature (London) 290:699–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. and H. Smith. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis, 2d Ed. Wiley, New York, 709 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1981). On coincidences. The Skeptical Inquirer 6(2): 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., ed. (1983). Numerical Taxomony. NATO Advanced Sciences Institute Series G (Ecological Sciences), No. 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th Ed. Oliver and Boyd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5(10):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. (1987). Introduction to ordination. In: Developments in Numerical Ecology, P. Legendre and L. Legendre, eds. NATO Advanced Sciences Institute Series G (Ecological Sciences), No. 14. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. (1979). Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. (1978). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V. and I. Olkin. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28:321–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, A.C., ed. (1970). The Biochemistry of Fruits and Their Products, Vol. 1. Food Science and Technology Monographs. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.E. (1982). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d Ed. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L. and P. Legendre. (1983). Numerical Ecology. Developments in Environmental Modelling, 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 419 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. and L. Legendre, eds. (1987). Developments in Numerical Ecology. NATO Advanced Sciences Institute Series G (Ecological Sciences), No. 14. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.G., Jr. (1977). Developments in multiple comparisons, 1966–1976. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72:779–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. and L. Ross. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Century Psychology Series. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1933). On a method of determining whether a sample of size n supposed to have been drawn from a parent population having a known probability integral has probably been drawn at random. Biometrika 25:379–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prepas, E.E. (1984). Some statistical methods for the design of experiments and analysis of samples. In: A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters, J.A. Downing and F.H. Rigler, eds. IBP Handbook No. 17, 2d Ed. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 266–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. (1983). Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122:240–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. and R.R. Sokal. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy — The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. (1981). Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, K.W. (1988). Disturbed by meta-analysis? Science 241:1407–1408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-Analysis. Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 59. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Downing, J.A. (1991). Comparing Apples with Oranges: Methods of Interecosystem Comparison. In: Cole, J., Lovett, G., Findlay, S. (eds) Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3122-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3122-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7804-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3122-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics